Re: [PATCH 0/2] xdg-shell: Proposal to be more generic for decorations

2016-12-11 Thread Adam Goode
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Dima Ryazanov wrote: > Overall, I like the idea - it seems to solve the issues with raise/lower, > etc. > > I wonder, though, if removing the explicit move/resize/etc. requests makes > it too restrictive. Suppose that, for whatever reason, the client wants to > tri

Re: [PATCH 0/2] xdg-shell: Proposal to be more generic for decorations

2016-12-09 Thread Dima Ryazanov
Overall, I like the idea - it seems to solve the issues with raise/lower, etc. I wonder, though, if removing the explicit move/resize/etc. requests makes it too restrictive. Suppose that, for whatever reason, the client wants to trigger a move or a resize using the right or middle button. Maybe it

[PATCH 0/2] xdg-shell: Proposal to be more generic for decorations

2016-12-09 Thread Adam Goode
Hi, There were many different opinions and suggestions for how to allow for raise and lower to be bound to mouse clicks in titlebars. This is one possible way forward. It removes some of the semantic requests in xdg-shell and replaces it with a "interact_with_decoration" request that lets more win