On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 19:18:44 -0500
Paul Sbarra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
>
> > I took a look at both of them, you are making an incompatible change to
> > wayland.xml, and breaking the generator.
> >
> > Essentially you are breaking the unwritten specifica
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> I took a look at both of them, you are making an incompatible change to
> wayland.xml, and breaking the generator.
>
> Essentially you are breaking the unwritten specification on how the XML
> files are processed into wire format and langua
Hi,
On 5 September 2014 13:51, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Essentially you are breaking the unwritten specification on how the XML
> files are processed into wire format and language bindings.
> Wayland-scanner is not the only generator, and wayland.xml is not the
> only XML file in existence.
>
> [
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 07:05:55 -0500
Paul Sbarra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Boyan Ding wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Actually it is not a hack, it is a very well-defined behavior (though
> > not clearly documented at present). We'll update the documentation to
> > reflect that. The mecha
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Boyan Ding wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Actually it is not a hack, it is a very well-defined behavior (though
> not clearly documented at present). We'll update the documentation to
> reflect that. The mechanic of creating objects undergoes some change as
> Pekka mentioned [1
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 22:05:00 -0500
Paul Sbarra wrote:
> I agree it's a hack, but it's also one that invalidates the protocol
> specification. If the wire protocol requires four arguments then the
> specification needs to reflect that. Currently if another tool or protocol
> implementation (like
Hi,
Actually it is not a hack, it is a very well-defined behavior (though
not clearly documented at present). We'll update the documentation to
reflect that. The mechanic of creating objects undergoes some change as
Pekka mentioned [1] and now it's been stable and won't change anymore (I
have to i
I agree it's a hack, but it's also one that invalidates the protocol
specification. If the wire protocol requires four arguments then the
specification needs to reflect that. Currently if another tool or protocol
implementation (like the gowl example previously mentioned) attempts to
generate cod
