Bump. I also just added this to the bug-tracker:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78190
--Jason Ekstrand
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:13:16 -0600
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > Technically, wl_surface.damage is supposed to be cal
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 21:13:16 -0600
Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Technically, wl_surface.damage is supposed to be called between
> wl_surface.attach and wl_surface.commit. However, I think Weston is fairly
> forgiving on this point and it might work.
The order between damage, attach, etc. must be irr
For what it's worth, mutter treats wl_surface.damage coordinates as buffer
coordinates right now. So we're broken for buffer transformations, but
doing the intuitive correct thing.
Having them be in buffer coordinates is the intuitive thing to do here, and
I think it's what most implementers do ri
Hi All,
I talked to Kristian in IRC about this today. It turns out that damage
isn't an issue in the case where we have an integer buffer_scale or a
transform that's a multiple of 180 degress. This is because, in these
cases, the buffer size is at least as large as the surface size and
damaging b
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> And I forgot reply-all again. This is why I shouldn't respond from my
> phone.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:44:24 -0600
>> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>
>> > I'll do a full reply lat
And I forgot reply-all again. This is why I shouldn't respond from my
phone.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 07:44:24 -0600
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > I'll do a full reply later, just a quick one now.
> > On Feb 25, 2014 2:31 AM, "Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 22:32:05 -0600
Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> When buffer_transform and buffer_scale were first introduced, added, we
> specified surface damage to be in surface coordinates. However, this does
Don't forget wl_viewport.
> not and will never work properly with EGL. Because the buf
When buffer_transform and buffer_scale were first introduced, added, we
specified surface damage to be in surface coordinates. However, this does
not and will never work properly with EGL. Because the buffer transform
and scale are handled directly by the client and not passed through EGL,
the EG
