On Mon, 7 May 2018 06:23:07 +
"Ray, Ian (GE Healthcare)" wrote:
> > On 4 May 2018, at 17.26, Matt Hoosier wrote:
> >
> > Rather than segfaulting by attempting to traverse an initially
> > null log handler pointer, explicitly print a message and abort.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matt Hoosier
Any takers to accept this one?
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Matt Hoosier wrote:
> Rather than segfaulting by attempting to traverse an initially
> null log handler pointer, explicitly print a message and abort.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Hoosier
> ---
> libweston/log.c | 22 +++
> On 4 May 2018, at 17.26, Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
> Rather than segfaulting by attempting to traverse an initially
> null log handler pointer, explicitly print a message and abort.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Hoosier
Nice improvement!
Reviewed-by: Ian Ray
> ---
> libweston/log.c | 22
Rather than segfaulting by attempting to traverse an initially
null log handler pointer, explicitly print a message and abort.
Signed-off-by: Matt Hoosier
---
libweston/log.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libweston/log.c b/libweston/l
