On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:04:18 -0700
Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:52 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:50:49 -0700
> > Chia-I Wu wrote:
> >
> > > Moving the discussion to this patch...
> > >
> > > This patch clarifies how implicit modifier can be supported,
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:52 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:50:49 -0700
> Chia-I Wu wrote:
>
> > Moving the discussion to this patch...
> >
> > This patch clarifies how implicit modifier can be supported, modelling
> > after Weston's behavior. I can see three options
> >
> >
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:50:49 -0700
Chia-I Wu wrote:
> Moving the discussion to this patch...
>
> This patch clarifies how implicit modifier can be supported, modelling
> after Weston's behavior. I can see three options
>
> 1. DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID means implicit modifier, and is always allow
Moving the discussion to this patch...
This patch clarifies how implicit modifier can be supported, modelling
after Weston's behavior. I can see three options
1. DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID means implicit modifier, and is always allowed
in buffer creation
2. DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID means implicit mo
Talked with Daniel offline. I sent a different version to revive the
format event.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 10:41 AM Chia-I Wu wrote:
> DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID means to derive the modifier from the dmabuf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu
> ---
> .../linux-dmabuf/linux-dmabuf-unstable-v1.xml | 1
DRM_FORMAT_MOD_INVALID means to derive the modifier from the dmabuf.
Signed-off-by: Chia-I Wu
---
.../linux-dmabuf/linux-dmabuf-unstable-v1.xml | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/unstable/linux-dmabuf/linux-dmabuf-unstable-v1.xml
b/unstable/l
