On 04.07.2016 14:14, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
Hi Pekka,
All your points below are good, so I don't think I need to reply for each one
of them with "OK".
I'll implement all your suggestions and reply again if I encounter any issues
with your proposals.
Thanks, Armin.
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:55:
On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:55:01 +0200
Armin Krezović wrote:
> When a surface gets created and no outputs are present,
> it won't get properly configured. This happens because
> call to configure_presented_surface() depends on a call
> to fs_output_set_surface() which requires a valid output.
>
> Th
When a surface gets created and no outputs are present,
it won't get properly configured. This happens because
call to configure_presented_surface() depends on a call
to fs_output_set_surface() which requires a valid output.
This patch makes the code save the surface when no
outputs are present an
