Re: [PATCH] documentation: clarify the need for wl_surface.damage

2017-10-03 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 03 Oct 2017 18:02:35 +0200 Mahdi Khanalizadeh wrote: > Hi, > thanks for reviewing. > > Am 03.10.2017 09:02:03 schrieb(en) Pekka Paalanen: > > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:39:56 +0200 > > Mahdi Khanalizadeh wrote: > > > > > Add an explanation for wl_surface.attach why a wl_surface.damage

Re: [PATCH] documentation: clarify the need for wl_surface.damage

2017-10-03 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 13:14:32 -0400 Jonas Ådahl wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:02:03AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:39:56 +0200 > > Mahdi Khanalizadeh wrote: > > > > > Add an explanation for wl_surface.attach why a wl_surface.damage request > > > is necessary. Ex

Re: [PATCH] documentation: clarify the need for wl_surface.damage

2017-10-03 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:02:03AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:39:56 +0200 > Mahdi Khanalizadeh wrote: > > > Add an explanation for wl_surface.attach why a wl_surface.damage request > > is necessary. Explicitly declare it implementation defined behaviour if the > > wl_su

Re: [PATCH] documentation: clarify the need for wl_surface.damage

2017-10-03 Thread Mahdi Khanalizadeh
Hi, thanks for reviewing. Am 03.10.2017 09:02:03 schrieb(en) Pekka Paalanen: On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:39:56 +0200 Mahdi Khanalizadeh wrote: > Add an explanation for wl_surface.attach why a wl_surface.damage request > is necessary. Explicitly declare it implementation defined behaviour if the

Re: [PATCH] documentation: clarify the need for wl_surface.damage

2017-10-03 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:39:56 +0200 Mahdi Khanalizadeh wrote: > Add an explanation for wl_surface.attach why a wl_surface.damage request > is necessary. Explicitly declare it implementation defined behaviour if the > wl_surface.damage request is omitted to give the compositor some leeway > on how

[PATCH] documentation: clarify the need for wl_surface.damage

2017-10-02 Thread Mahdi Khanalizadeh
Add an explanation for wl_surface.attach why a wl_surface.damage request is necessary. Explicitly declare it implementation defined behaviour if the wl_surface.damage request is omitted to give the compositor some leeway on how it handles attaches. Signed-off-by: Mahdi Khanalizadeh --- protocol/