I have been using this patch for a while and it looks good, I think
somebody should push it.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 08:35 AM, Rui Matos wrote:
> > Otherwise a parallel make invocation could fail due to the directory
> > not existing.
> >
> > Signed-o
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:44:25AM -0800, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
> On 01/06/2015 08:35 AM, Rui Matos wrote:
> > Otherwise a parallel make invocation could fail due to the directory
> > not existing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rui Matos
>
> Looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jon A. Cruz
Thanks, applied:
On 01/06/2015 08:35 AM, Rui Matos wrote:
> Otherwise a parallel make invocation could fail due to the directory
> not existing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Matos
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Jon A. Cruz
> ---
> doc/publican/Makefile.am | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff
Otherwise a parallel make invocation could fail due to the directory
not existing.
Signed-off-by: Rui Matos
---
doc/publican/Makefile.am | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/publican/Makefile.am b/doc/publican/Makefile.am
index 278da12..50a6188 100644
--- a/doc
