Re: [PATCH] core: implement a safe wl_signal_emit

2018-02-21 Thread Derek Foreman
On 2018-02-14 09:23 AM, Simon Ser wrote: The previous implementation tried to be safe but wasn't: a listener couldn't remove the next one. This removes the need for wl_priv_signal. newsignal-test is now merged into signal-test. --- This is followup of "RFC: server: implement wl_priv_signal_emit

[PATCH] core: implement a safe wl_signal_emit

2018-02-14 Thread Simon Ser
The previous implementation tried to be safe but wasn't: a listener couldn't remove the next one. This removes the need for wl_priv_signal. newsignal-test is now merged into signal-test. --- This is followup of "RFC: server: implement wl_priv_signal_emit without emit_list" [1] which removes wl_pri