On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:14:11 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9 March 2018 at 14:08, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 10:08:37 +
> > Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> + if (!surface) {
> >> + input->output = NULL;
> >> + input->has_focus = false;
> >>
Hi,
On 9 March 2018 at 14:08, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 10:08:37 +
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>> + if (!surface) {
>> + input->output = NULL;
>> + input->has_focus = false;
>> + notify_pointer_focus(&input->base, NULL, 0, 0);
>> +
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018 10:08:37 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Due to race conditions, it is (vanishingly unlikely but) possible to
> receive a wl_pointer.enter event referring to a wl_surface we have just
> destroyed. If this happens, wl_surface will be NULL. Detect this, clear
> out our focus, and re
Due to race conditions, it is (vanishingly unlikely but) possible to
receive a wl_pointer.enter event referring to a wl_surface we have just
destroyed. If this happens, wl_surface will be NULL. Detect this, clear
out our focus, and return.
Other pointer and keyboard events are robust against destr
