Re: wayland 1.6.91 testsuite failure [Re: [ANNOUNCE] wayland 1.6.91]

On Monday 2015-02-02 11:17, Marek Chalupa wrote: >Sent a patch that fixed it for me. I meant to send it as a reply to this, >but something went wrong. >Here it is: [PATCH wayland] test-runner: wait for concrete pid  > >Does it fix it on your side? Nope, the patch does not address my issue. Howeve

Re: wayland 1.6.91 testsuite failure [Re: [ANNOUNCE] wayland 1.6.91]

Sent a patch that fixed it for me. I meant to send it as a reply to this, but something went wrong. Here it is: [PATCH wayland] test-runner: wait for concrete pid Does it fix it on your side? Cheers, Marek On Mon, F

Re: wayland 1.6.91 testsuite failure [Re: [ANNOUNCE] wayland 1.6.91]

Or does the tests run in parallel? On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > From openSUSE's attempts to build wayland 1.6.91: > > [ 98s] > [ 98s] Timeout was set to 3 seconds from now. > [ 98s] test "threading_errors_tst": exit s

Re: wayland 1.6.91 testsuite failure [Re: [ANNOUNCE] wayland 1.6.91]

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > From openSUSE's attempts to build wayland 1.6.91: > > [ 98s] > [ 98s] Timeout was set to 3 seconds from now. > [ 98s] test "threading_errors_tst": exit status 0, pass. > [ 98s] ---

wayland 1.6.91 testsuite failure [Re: [ANNOUNCE] wayland 1.6.91]

From openSUSE's attempts to build wayland 1.6.91: [ 98s] [ 98s] Timeout was set to 3 seconds from now. [ 98s] test "threading_errors_tst": exit status 0, pass. [ 98s] [ 98s] unable to open lockfile /hom

[ANNOUNCE] wayland 1.6.91

Hi, Here's the alpha release on the path towards 1.7.0. I'll leave the detailed release notes for later, but as you can see from the list below, much of the attention this cycle focused on revamping the codebase's doxygen documentation. Benjamin Herr (4): doc: Mark up some code examples