2011/9/22 Sam Spilsbury :
> [...] For
> example, if pages loaded by a webbrowser contained javascript that
> would allow the client window to move around then there is no way to
> guaruntee (unless you were paranoid) that this would not be allowed.
I would expect the web browser to manage what it
I've got one questions about unresponsive applications.
I'm quite good at punishing computers. I've found that many
applications stop responding when they shouldn't, for example when
accessing the disk (say if I trash the disk a lot doing something else
at the same time).
Last time I read about W
I see a lot of discussions on this list about what clients should be
allowed to do. Is this such a big deal? All software on my Linux
systems is free software, and if it doesn't behave it can be fixed.
Any restrictions in what is allowed is bound to stifle innovation in
one way or another.
If I do
On 6 May 2011 09:42, Sam Spilsbury wrote:
> You cannot assume that there will be a universally adopted method to
> styling because we see on every single platform that there will *not*
> be one. The best way to enforce styling is to enforce it at the window
> manager level, so that the application
On 6 May 2011 08:25, "Niklas Höglund" wrote:
> so maybe just have some special hotels or similar for this.
Annoying text prediction. Hotkeys, not hotels.
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.fr
On 6 May 2011 02:10, "Kristian Høgsberg" wrote:
> I can't remember
> when I last had to deal with an unresponsive application
I had this happen to me in Windows XP yesterday. To be fair, I was pushing
the machine by running two VMs, one of which was running Windows update.
Chrome may have been pa
