And yes, I want to keep it relatively "dead"
because one man's dead fork is another man's stable source. ;)
Thanks,
Nick
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:03:06 -0700
> Mikalai Kisialiou wrote:
>
> > Juan, Jon
tions like Wayland.
Thanks,
Nick
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Jørgen Lind wrote:
> Hi Mikalai
>
> On 12 July 2012 08:03, Mikalai Kisialiou wrote:
> > Juan, Jonas and Christopher,
> >
> > I appreciate your feedback! Small additions to shells are indeed not a
> &g
her.halse.rog...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 18:53 -0700, Mikalai Kisialiou wrote:
> > There is an article on http://www.phoronix.com that there is a new
> > feature of sliding desktop support in Weston. I am wondering if it
> > would make sense to split
There is an article on http://www.phoronix.com that there is a new feature
of sliding desktop support in Weston. I am wondering if it would make sense
to split Weston implemention into 2 distinct ones: a barebone
implementation with minimal features (architecture + driver
compatibility) and a full-
Not sure if this list is the proper media for communicating potential
issues/bugs. I've just built Weston from the git repo on a brand new Ubuntu
12.02 LTS. During Weston compilation there is an error that some libpthread
functions are not found. The problem can be fixed by modifying
./weston/wcap/
