Looks good to me, thanks for addressing this.
Cheers,
Martin G.
On Monday, May 9, 2016 2:45:05 PM CEST Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> The existing specification was not explicitly clear on when
> wl_subcompositor.get_subsurface request actually adds the sub-surface to
> the pa
On Thursday, April 28, 2016 2:08:07 PM CEST Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > > The biggest problem for me is the request set_window_geometry. I think I
> > > mentioned it already before on the wayland list. Basically I have no
> > > idea how to implement that in KWin. We have only one geometry for a
> > >
On Thursday, April 28, 2016 5:36:58 PM CEST Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:36:14AM +0200, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > Hi Wayland and Plasma,
> >
> > I finished the implementation of xdg-shell in KWayland [1] and KWin [2].
> > Overall it was more straigh
Hi Wayland and Plasma,
I finished the implementation of xdg-shell in KWayland [1] and KWin [2].
Overall it was more straight forward than I would have expected. Especially
the changes to KWin were surprisingly minor (with one huge exception).
Now some questions/remarks:
* What's a server suppos
On Tuesday, April 19, 2016 8:57:14 PM CEST Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 02:32:08PM +0200, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > Hi Wayland devs,
> >
> > finally adding xdg-shell support in KWayland and KWin became the top-most
> > item on my todo list. But I'
Hi Wayland devs,
finally adding xdg-shell support in KWayland and KWin became the top-most item
on my todo list. But I'm wondering: where do I find the most recent protocol
draft and test clients for them?
Cheers
Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 8:14:25 AM CEST Drew DeVault wrote:
> On 2016-03-29 10:25 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > > - More detailed surface roles (should it be floating, is it a modal,
> > >
> > > does it want to draw its own decorations, etc)
> >
&
On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 8:12:32 AM CEST Drew DeVault wrote:
> On 2016-03-29 10:20 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > > - Output configuration
> >
> > we have our kwin-kscreen specific protocol for this. You can find it at:
> > https://quickgit.kde.org
On Sunday, March 27, 2016 4:34:37 PM CEST Drew DeVault wrote:
> Greetings! I am the maintainer of the Sway Wayland compositor.
>
> http://swaywm.org
>
> It's almost the Year of Wayland on the Desktop(tm), and I have
> reached out to each of the projects this message is addressed to (GNOME,
> Kwin
On Sunday, March 27, 2016 4:34:37 PM CEST Drew DeVault wrote:
> Greetings! I am the maintainer of the Sway Wayland compositor.
>
> http://swaywm.org
>
> It's almost the Year of Wayland on the Desktop(tm), and I have
> reached out to each of the projects this message is addressed to (GNOME,
> Kwin
On Tuesday, March 29, 2016 9:23:13 AM CEST Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 04:34:37PM -0400, Drew DeVault wrote:
> > Greetings! I am the maintainer of the Sway Wayland compositor.
> >
> > http://swaywm.org
> >
> > It's almost the Year of Wayland on the Desktop(tm), and I have
> >
On Monday, March 21, 2016 11:07:39 AM CET you wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:36:59 +0100
>
> Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > Hi Wayland-devs,
> >
> > while implementing sub-surface support in KWin I run into a small problem
> > regarding the get_subsurface requ
Hi Wayland-devs,
while implementing sub-surface support in KWin I run into a small problem
regarding the get_subsurface request:
When should the new subsurface be added to the parent surface?
My interpretation was that the subsurface will only be added after the next
commit on the parent surfa
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 5:43:13 PM CET Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > you need to describe what classifies as "user activity".
> >
> > something like "after no input events with a new timestamp"? I'm always
> > bad at writing documentation ;-)
>
> yeah, but you'll need to figure out what you
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 4:19:12 PM CET Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:12:01PM +0100, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > Hi Wayland-developers,
> >
> > at KDE we developed a protocol for our framework kidletime [1]. The idea
> > is to notify Wayland
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 2:59:38 PM CET Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 02:12:01PM +0100, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > Hi Wayland-developers,
> >
> > at KDE we developed a protocol for our framework kidletime [1]. The idea
> > is to notify Wayland
Hi Wayland-developers,
at KDE we developed a protocol for our framework kidletime [1]. The idea is to
notify Wayland clients when a wl_seat has been idle for a specified time. We
use this for example for power management, screen locking etc. But a common
use case is also setting a user as away
On Tuesday 31 December 2013 05:02:30 Sebastian Wick wrote:
> I'm currently working on a system which allows specific clients to use
> restricted interfaces [1]. This is needed for applications like
> screenhooters,
> desktop recorders outside of the compositor, accessibility tools and
> others.
Tha
On Friday 15 November 2013 07:50:55 Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> Ah, whoops, I read your email wrong. It sounds like you're also in favor of
> requiring CSD support from the client.
Yep, I'm fine with ensuring that CSD is the required fallback. As said: I don't
want to force anybody to SSD :-)
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
