Re: [PATCH] documentation: clarify the need for wl_surface.damage

Hi, thanks for reviewing. Am 03.10.2017 09:02:03 schrieb(en) Pekka Paalanen: On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:39:56 +0200 Mahdi Khanalizadeh wrote: > Add an explanation for wl_surface.attach why a wl_surface.damage request > is necessary. Explicitly declare it implementation defined behavi

[PATCH] documentation: clarify the need for wl_surface.damage

Add an explanation for wl_surface.attach why a wl_surface.damage request is necessary. Explicitly declare it implementation defined behaviour if the wl_surface.damage request is omitted to give the compositor some leeway on how it handles attaches. Signed-off-by: Mahdi Khanalizadeh --- protocol