In Haiku OS, there is a separate thread for window content versus input
response, so its (theoretically) impossible to make an applications
completely nonresponsive. It should always at least be able to resize. I
would love to see this set as the standard model in Wayland, even if
compatibility wit
This took a good bit of time to process, but I encourage everyone on the
mailing list to read it and discuss it. If we do implement an autosave API
similar to OS X Lion's, the session management would be simplified in a
number of ways.
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Chani wrote:
> so, as far as
With the exception of incoming phone call scenario, how does one go about
cancelling a touch event anyways? Unless I'm wildly mistaken, this is an
unlikely scenario. The way you normally cancel touch events is you touch
down on a button, then move your finger off the button and lift up, but that
is
Will everything in GNOME be forwards compatible with Wayland *without* using
an X session within Wayland? I didn't think that was going to happen.
Therefore we should start over with a clean base that's useful both to those
with and without multitouch, and then figure out how to get all the gnome
a
Those are all designed for X are they not?
On Jun 27, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Kai Mast wrote:
> On 24.06.2011 15:16, Kai Wohlfahrt wrote:
>> I have set myself a rather ambitious project to start this summer, and would
>> like to ask some questions before I get started.
>> The aim is to write a compos
After you get started, let me know of any bitesize fixes I can work on. I've
never worked on a large project, so starting small for me would be best, but I
am very confident in C++. The main recommendation I have is to start from the
assumption that this screen will be projector size and could b
.
On Mar 17, 2011, at 11:42 AM, "jonsm...@gmail.com" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Josh Leverette wrote:
>> (And I have been known to get overexcited about ideas sometimes, which may
>> cause an idea to go from cool to killer)
>
> A couple of year
(And I have been known to get overexcited about ideas sometimes, which may
cause an idea to go from cool to killer)
Sincerely,
Josh
On Mar 17, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Josh Leverette wrote:
> Ah, ok, it's good to hear something remotely (no pun intended) similar is in
> the works.
people don't have lots of iron sitting in their garages. I think you may
>> have upgraded "Wouldn't it be cool if...?" to "Dude, this is a killer
>> feature!"
>>
>> Sending from a mobile, pardon the brevity. ~ C.
>>
>> On Ma
ill of course, make this nasty hack obsolete since you can specify
> automount points of /home/ as type sshfs.
>
> If you don't want any disks, not even a USB key, booting over the network
> with gpxe is pretty easy to set up these days and uses HTTP or HTTPS instead
> of tf
HPC (High Performance Compute) Architecture
...the means by which we can make the Lion tremble.
I have hung around in the shadows of Wayland's development since it was an
infant, reading the different discussions that have taken place. I've
commented occasionally, but not very often. I don't beli
I'm not certain, but I think there could eventually be enough variation for
that to be needed. However, even if there isn't, parsing an XML file might be a
better long term solution that weakly linked functions and things like that.
Perhaps we could modify his idea about an XML profile structure
No? wayland is a very separate project. It is not backwards compatible with X.
It will run X programs in a copy of X. Nobody is panicking anyways.
On Dec 21, 2010, at 8:27 PM, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
> The X server contains lots and lots of crufty old code going back to the
> 1980s that no
Sorry, I didn't reply-all
> I personally think this is feasible. On Mac os x there was a utility called
> Fermata which would actually freeze an application until you gave it the go
> ahead to continue. The kernels of both Linux and Mac derive from Unix, and so
> I would assume such core functi
14 matches
Mail list logo
