On 10/13/19 2:05 PM, Scott Anderson wrote:
(Sorry to CCs for spam, I made an error in my first posting)
Hi,
There were certainly some interesting changes discussed at the allocator
workshop during XDC this year, and I'd like to just summarise my
thoughts on it and make sure everybody is on the
Hello everyone,
As many are aware, we took up the issue of surface/memory allocation at
XDC this year, picking up where a lengthy thread on this list left off.
The outcome of that discussion was the beginnings of a design proposal
for a library that would server as a cross-device, cross-proces
On 06/13/2016 03:14 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
On 13/06/16 12:32, Martin Peres wrote:
This discussion has been going on for years (not this thread, the general
discussion).
Pekka made me realize on IRC that I was not specific enough
about what I mean here.
By discussion here, I am talking about
On 05/16/2016 02:36 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 05:46:51PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
On 12 May 2016 at 00:08, James Jones wrote:
The EGLStream encapsulation takes into consideration the new use cases
EGLImage, GBM, etc. were intended to address, and restores what I
On 05/11/2016 04:55 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:08 PM James Jones mailto:jajo...@nvidia.com>> wrote:
On 05/11/2016 02:31 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 21:43, James Jones mailto:jajo...@nvidia.com>>
On 05/11/2016 02:31 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi James,
On 11 May 2016 at 21:43, James Jones wrote:
On 05/04/2016 08:56 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Right - but as with the point I was making below, GBM _right now_ is
more capable than Streams _right now_. GBM right now would require API
additions
On 05/04/2016 08:56 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
Interleaving both replies ...
On 3 May 2016 at 19:44, James Jones wrote:
On 05/03/2016 09:53 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
On 3 May 2016 at 17:07, James Jones wrote:
No, the necessary extensions can not be contained within the binding.
There
is not
On 05/03/2016 09:58 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi James,
On 3 May 2016 at 17:29, James Jones wrote:
Given Wayland is designed such that clients drive buffer allocation
I'd just note that this isn't strictly true. I've personally
implemented Wayland support for platforms (media
On 05/03/2016 09:53 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi James,
On 3 May 2016 at 17:07, James Jones wrote:
On 04/29/2016 03:07 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
With new Wayland protocol, patches to all Wayland compositors to send
proper
hints to clients using this protocol, improvements to GBM, and updates to
On 05/03/2016 09:06 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:16:28PM -0700, James Jones wrote:
Streams could provide a way to express that the compositor picked the wrong
plane, but they don't solve the optimal configuration problem. Configuration
is a tricky mix of polic
On 04/29/2016 03:07 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi James,
On 29 April 2016 at 22:16, James Jones wrote:
I was on leave when this discussion was started. Now that I'm back, I'd
like to respond to a few points raised below:
Welcome back!
Thanks!
On 03/29/2016 09:44 AM, Daniel S
I was on leave when this discussion was started. Now that I'm back, I'd
like to respond to a few points raised below:
On 03/29/2016 09:44 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi Andy,
On 23 March 2016 at 00:12, Andy Ritger wrote:
Thanks for the thorough responses, Daniel.
No problem; as I said, I'm ac
12 matches
Mail list logo
