Hi,
I'm the author of Greenfield, and just like you and a lot of people, I too
wanted a machine I could access any time, any place, anywhere.
First some technical considerations you have to keep in mind depending on
which solution you prefer:
- Remote virtual screen (VNC, RDP, Citrix, ...). This
-- Forwarded message -
Van: Erik De Rijcke
Date: zo 31 mrt. 2019 om 08:23
Subject: Re: State of network transparency & a possible approach
To: Manuel Stoeckl
Hi Manuel,
Network transparant wayland has already been done:
https://github.com/udevbe/greenfield
Disclaimer: I am
Nothing major but I thought I would be cool to share :)
As some of you already know, Greenfield can run remote Wayland applications
from different hosts. But as of recently, it can do more as well.
Run applications directly inside the user's browser.
This can be done using a Web worker. A Web Wo
Hi All,
First of all I'd like to say that the move to Gitlab makes me really happy
\o/! It will definitely lower the contribution barrier for a lot of people
(including me!) as things are now far more accessible, visible and overall
easier to manage.
Which brings me to a remark/question on how m
Hi all,
Some time ago I mentioned project Westfield and how it could be used to
create an html5 wayland compositor.
Today I'm proving I was not lying :)
I've recorded a short clip to demonstrate what it looks like:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lyihdFK7EE
>From the description:
Html5 Wayl
I had this lying around for some time but realized I never really announced
it on the ML, so here it is!
https://github.com/udevbe/westfield
So what is it?
Westfield is wayland protocol xml parser and generator for Javascript, much
like what libwayland is for C.
It's nearly fully compatible on th
-- Forwarded message --
From: Erik De Rijcke
Date: 2017-02-24 8:46 GMT+01:00
Subject: Re: Remote display with 3D acceleration using Wayland/Weston
To: Christian Stroetmann
I made a poc for a remote (gl) display some time ago for my own compositor,
but instead of using rdp, I
I remember facing similar marshalling issues when writing my bindings. The
thing is that the wire args do not always match the literal protocol args,
especially when creating a new object iirc. If it might be of any help, you
can always take a look at wayland-java-bindings on github to get an idea
w.
>
> Regards,
> Vinoth
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Erik De Rijcke
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Vinoth,
>>
>> I replied to your report on github. (btw I'm not jason ekstrand or
>> 'jekstrand' on github, but 'zubnix').
>>
>
Hi Vinoth,
I replied to your report on github. (btw I'm not jason ekstrand or
'jekstrand' on github, but 'zubnix').
To give some more context:
I started creating my own java wayland bindings after jason's work got
abandoned. (see https://github.com/udevbe/wayland-java-bindings ) and I am
currentl
Changing C int to C uint is ok for Java. Java only knows signed ints
anyway, I therefore already map C uint to Java int, which is ok as long as
no arithmetic is needed.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen
wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:17:38 +0100
> "Nils Chr. Brause" wrote:
>
> >
This is just some small FYI status feedback from the Java bindings, so it
doesn't get lost/people know.
from irc #wayland:
19:57 < bryce> anyone working on or interested in language bindings, would
be great to get your Reviewed-by or even just Acked-by on Auke's enum
patchset from today.
19:58 <
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Auke Booij wrote:
>
> I really don't understand this discussion. Is the claim that the usage
> of enums in java is problematic, because inserting a new value in an
> existing enum might change the index of later values, thereby creating
> an inconsistency?
>
Corre
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Nils Chr. Brause
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:41:22 +0200
> > Erik De Rijcke wrote:
> >
> >> Adding enum members is backward compatible for Java. If
Adding enum members is backward compatible for Java. If you compile against
an enum with 2 members, and later on a new member is added, you can simply
use the new version of the enum.
Important however is that the order of old members do not change when new
members are added.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015
The enum discussion seems to become a lengthy one and it's becoming hard to
see the forest for the trees.
I'll give my input as a Java bindings dev. Please correct any bad
assumptions or observations I've made.
>From what I see in Auke's patches:
- Defining an uint (bitfield) or int (single enum
16 matches
Mail list logo
