documentation (Pekka)
- Rename IOCTL (Christian)
- Fix typo in drm_syncobj_add_eventfd() (Christian)
Signed-off-by: Simon Ser
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Christian König
Cc: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: Daniel Stone
Cc: Pekka Paalanen
Cc: James Jones
Reviewed-by: Christian König
---
Toy
Am 12.10.22 um 12:25 schrieb Simon Ser:
On Tuesday, October 11th, 2022 at 14:10, Christian König
wrote:
Am 10.10.22 um 11:13 schrieb Simon Ser:
On Sunday, October 9th, 2022 at 20:00, Christian König
wrote:
Am 09.10.22 um 16:40 schrieb Simon Ser:
Introduce a new
Am 10.10.22 um 11:13 schrieb Simon Ser:
On Sunday, October 9th, 2022 at 20:00, Christian König
wrote:
Am 09.10.22 um 16:40 schrieb Simon Ser:
Introduce a new DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE_REGISTER_EVENTFD IOCTL
which signals an eventfd when a timeline point completes.
I was entertaining the
want to integrate the wait with
their poll(2)-based event loop.
Signed-off-by: Simon Ser
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Christian König
Cc: Bas Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: Daniel Stone
Cc: Pekka Paalanen
Cc: James Jones
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h | 3 +
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c
red by time + ‘weight’ and
flattened whenever modified? Something else?
Have a great weekend.
-d
On 18 Jun 2021, at 5:43 pm, Christian König wrote:
Am 18.06.21 um 17:17 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
Ignoring _all_ fences is officially ok for pinned dma-buf. This is
what v4l does. Aside fro
Am 18.06.21 um 17:17 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
Ignoring _all_ fences is officially ok for pinned dma-buf. This is
what v4l does. Aside from it's definitely not just i915 that does this
even on the drm side, we have a few more drivers nowadays.
No it seriously isn't. If drivers are doing thi
Am 18.06.21 um 19:20 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:43 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 18.06.21 um 17:17 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
Ignoring _all_ fences is officially ok for pinned dma-buf. This is
what v4l does. Aside from it's definitely not just i915 that does this
Am 16.06.21 um 20:30 schrieb Jason Ekstrand:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:41 AM Christian König
wrote:
Hi Jason & Daniel,
maybe I should explain once more where the problem with this approach is
and why I think we need to get that fixed before we can do something
like this here.
To summa
Am 17.06.21 um 21:58 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
[SNIP]
But, to the broader point, maybe? I'm a little fuzzy on exactly where
i915 inserts and/or depends on fences.
When you combine that with complex drivers which use TT
aWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=MM5c55nspWbUxzajqBv1iNHdz2TYAImG2XPOSnDE6qQ%3D&reserved=0
v10 (Jason Ekstrand, Daniel Vetter):
- Add reviews/acks
- Add a patch to rename _rcu to _unlocked
- Split things better so import is clearly RFC status
v11 (Daniel Vetter):
- Add
Am 18.06.21 um 20:45 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:02 PM Christian König
wrote:
Am 18.06.21 um 19:20 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
[SNIP]
The whole thing was introduced with this commit here:
commit f2c24b83ae90292d315aa7ac029c6ce7929e01aa
Author: Maarten Lankhorst
Date: Wed
tainers
- Add a patch to document DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC
- Generally better docs
- Use separate structs for import/export (easier to document)
- Fix an issue in the import patch
v12 (Daniel Vetter):
- Better docs for DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC
v12 (Christian König):
- Drop the rename patch in favo
12 matches
Mail list logo