On 5 December 2017 at 13:15, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
> I've added Ross and Fabien, who've been looking at this for Yocto.
>
> On 18 August 2017 at 10:30, Quentin Glidic
> wrote:
> > --- a/wayland-scanner.m4
> > +++ b/wayland-scanner.m4
> > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> > +#serial 2
>
> I don't qui
On 17 July 2015 at 12:31, Ross Burton wrote:
> + $(AM_V_GEN)$(MKDIR_P) $(dir $@) && $(AM_V_GEN)$(SED) \
>
Argh. V3 incoming.
Ross
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/w
On 17 July 2015 at 12:35, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> You should have only one $(AM_V_GEN) per rule. Otherwise output will be:
>
> GEN ivi-shell/weston.ini
> GEN ivi-shell/weston.ini
>
> It may look like a bug to the user.
>
> You should do it that way:
>
> $(AM_V_GEN)$(MKDIR_P) $(dir $@); $(SED)
Bump. Lots of mails but no concrete acceptance or rejection.
Ross
On 1 July 2015 at 22:51, Ross Burton wrote:
> The previous idiom for building a cross-compiled Wayland is to build once
> for
> the build host (with --enable-scanner --disable-libraries) to get a
> wayland-scanner binary that ca
On 6 July 2015 at 20:40, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> An even cleaner solution would be to break the scanner out as a separate
> source package from libwayland. Then all this mess can be handled
> through normal package dependencies.
>
For such a small tool with a fairly simple solution in cross c
On 3 July 2015 at 17:16, Derek Foreman wrote:
> What's the benefit in forcing everyone to build wayland-scanner? Right
> now it's not required. Is there actually a reason this ability must be
> broken to add the functionality you want?
>
Just realised you might be talking about cross environme
On 3 July 2015 at 17:16, Derek Foreman wrote:
> What's the benefit in forcing everyone to build wayland-scanner? Right
> now it's not required. Is there actually a reason this ability must be
> broken to add the functionality you want?
>
Considering a scanner is needed to build all of wayland,
On 3 July 2015 at 15:50, Derek Foreman wrote:
> On 01/07/15 04:51 PM, Ross Burton wrote:
> > The previous idiom for building a cross-compiled Wayland is to build
> once for
> > the build host (with --enable-scanner --disable-libraries) to get a
> > wayland-scanner binary that can then be used in
