Re: [RFC v2 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-26 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 08:35 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 03:49:55PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 12:00 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > > > > diff --git a/README.md b/README.md > > > index 2f611c5..

Re: [RFC v2 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-26 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 12:00 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:16:24AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 10:20 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:19:45PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > > On S

Re: [RFC v2 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 09:47 -0700, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > > We originally discussed maybe using pipes and now more unix domain > sockets for 'non kernel evdev fds'. As part of the discussion we > realized ioctls wouldn't be available. Thinking about it some more, I > think the lack of ioc

Re: [RFC v2 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 10:20 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:19:45PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:47:20AM -0700, Roderick Colenbrander > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Peter Hutterer > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr

Re: [RFC v2 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-18 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 14:05 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:43:57PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Apr 2017 14:04:40 +1000 > > Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > > > For the initial patchset, see  > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2017-March

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-05 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 10:42 +0100, Steven Newbury wrote: > > There's a reason the mouse support from the X DGA Extension out- > survived the "direct framebuffer access".  The latency through the > wire > whether X or Wayland for mouse input it just too high for mouse > controlled high framerate 3

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-05 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 12:40 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 14:45:13 +0200 Bastien Nocera > said: > > > On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 20:32 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 10:22:24 +1000 Peter Hutterer > > who- > > > t

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 20:32 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 10:22:24 +1000 Peter Hutterer t.net> > said: > > > On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 08:16:03AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:29:19 +1000 Peter Hutterer > > @who-t.net> > > > said: > > > > > > If

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 08:16 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:29:19 +1000 Peter Hutterer -t.net> > said: > > If you're going to do this ... why not just do it for keyboards, > mice, touch > panels etc. too? > > My point is - the same reasons these other devices don't be laz

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-04 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey Roderick, On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 16:08 -0700, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Thanks for sharing this proposal. I have some little comments for a > later stage, but would rather discuss some big items first. > > The feedback I will share comes from a couple different angles as we

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 10:59 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > Mostly for the archives, Timo Paulssen pointed me to  > https://github.com/denilsonsa/udev-joystick-blacklist > At least for the compositor's side of things this is a good start, > it's > independent of this protocol though. Very usefu

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-03 Thread Bastien Nocera
Hey, On Fri, 2017-03-31 at 12:23 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 17:29:19 +1000 > Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > + > > +   > > + This event is sent to notify the client of a custom > > property that > > + applies to this device. The property is a standard > > key/val

Re: iio sensors, acceleration and gyro.

2015-10-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 08:39 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:20:27PM -0500, Mike Mestnik wrote: > > Hello, > >   I've been working on a project called iio-sensor-proxy, it's a > > project to take sensor readings and make them available over > > dbus.  I > > feel that this t

Re: [PATCH libinput 0/8] Add libinput_device_suspend() to disable devices

2014-09-30 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 16:18 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > replying to myself, now that I've had a bit of a think about this all. > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:18:48PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > This patchset adds two new API hooks, libinput_device_suspend() and > > libinput_device_resume()