Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Add colorcorrection protocol

2014-03-31 Thread Alex Elsayed
Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:25:34 +0100 > Richard Hughes wrote: > >> On 31 March 2014 08:46, Pekka Paalanen >> wrote: >> > how much data can an ICC profile be? >> >> Printer profiles can be several megabytes in size, but display >> profiles (what will be seen here) are usual

Re: Inter-client surface embedding

2014-02-20 Thread Alex Elsayed
Mark Thomas wrote: > > As part of my current attempts to get MATE fully working on Wayland, I was > planning to take a look at porting mate-panel this weekend. However, I > pretty quickly hit the first snag, which is that Gtk on Wayland doesn't > support the GtkSocket/GtkPlug interface, which ma

Re: Thoughts about decoration information in the xdg_shell

2013-11-17 Thread Alex Elsayed
Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 18 de novembro de 2013 06:37:47, Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> That sounds look a good solution to me! > > Make it simpler: all clients MUST be able to draw decorations. That's what > Wayland up until now requires anyway. It's a given that they must be *able

Re: Thoughts about decoration information in the xdg_shell

2013-11-15 Thread Alex Elsayed
Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Martin Gräßlin > wrote: > > > I think the trap that I personally don't want to run into is the case > where we have a compositor that doesn't support SSD coupled to a client > that doesn't support CSD. Nobody can draw the decorations,

Re: [PATCH] RDP compositor take 5

2013-03-31 Thread Alex Elsayed
Hardening wrote: > On 30/03/2013 21:34, Jason Ekstrand wrote: >> Hardening, >> >> I'm curious what your use-case is for passing an FD to an RDP server. >> Do you intend it to have an authentication daemon that then starts RDP >> weston? >> > In this case there's no listener. This could be used

Re: RFC: multitouch support v2

2011-12-23 Thread Alex Elsayed
Chase Douglas writes: > I don't think anyone is forgetting about indirect devices, at least I'm > not :). However, their use scenarios are a bit easier to deal with > because there's no pointer emulation. > > We will also want the ability to have a touchscreen "attached" to a real > keyboard. Ima

Re: RFC: multitouch support v2

2011-12-22 Thread Alex Elsayed
Kristian Høgsberg writes: > Right... in the MPX sense, right? So you could have a keyboard and > mouse combo controlling one pointer/kb focus and the touch screen > being its own master device. Then maybe you could have one person > using the touch screen UI, and another person using the kb/mous