Not completely blocking makes sense for the compositor, but why not
block the client?
For the compositor, wouldn't a timeout in the sendmsg make sense?
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:39:08 +0100
Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 4:21 PM jleivent wrote:
>
> > I've been looking
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 4:21 PM jleivent wrote:
> I've been looking into some of the issues about allowing the socket's
> kernel buffer to run out of space, and was wondering why not simply
> remove MSG_DONTWAIT from the sendmsg call in wl_connection_flush? That
> should implement flow cont
I've been looking into some of the issues about allowing the socket's
kernel buffer to run out of space, and was wondering why not simply
remove MSG_DONTWAIT from the sendmsg call in wl_connection_flush? That
should implement flow control by having the sender thread wait until
the receiver has emp
