Hi Pekka,
Those are fair answers. In my case, it does happen that the configuration
available on the virtual cards includes a way to set distinct names reported by
drmGetVersion()->name.
It looks like the consensus is that UDev rules probably shouldn't be consulting
the name as a distinguishin
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 16:16:48 +
"Hoosier, Matt" wrote:
>
> The /dev/dri/by-path idea works, I suppose, if you have different
> physical graphics cards. In my case, that's not true. These are
> virtualized cards that the silicon vendor's DRM drivers use to expose
> different subsets of DRM res
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:28:37 -0400
Harry Wentland wrote:
> On 2021-09-22 04:31, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:05:05 -0400
> > Harry Wentland wrote:
> >
> >> On 2021-09-21 09:31, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 20:14:50 -0400
> >>> Harry Wentland wrote:
>
