Re: Protocol backwards compatibility requirements?

2020-04-21 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:50:27AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: [...] > > > If you're asking if the implementation for version < N could be > > > deleted or avoided, then I'd say no. Definitely no for desktop > > > compositors, probably no for anything else public. > > > > The sub-interfaces are

Re: Protocol backwards compatibility requirements?

2020-04-21 Thread Scott Anderson
On 21/04/20 12:57 pm, Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 15:05, Pekka Paalanen wrote: On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:47:56 +1000 Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote:  On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 14:27, Simon Ser wrote:  > Hi,  >  > On Monday, April 13, 2020 1:59 AM, Peter Hu

Re: Protocol backwards compatibility requirements?

2020-04-21 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:57:34 +1000 Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 15:05, Pekka Paalanen > wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:47:56 +1000 > > Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 14:27, Simon Ser > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, >

Re: Protocol backwards compatibility requirements?

2020-04-21 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:01:14 +1000 Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 03:05:32PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:47:56 +1000 > > Christopher James Halse Rogers wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 14:27, Simon Ser wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > >