Re: wayland-protocols scope and governance

2019-10-10 Thread Simon Ser
This is v5 of the proposal. Changes from v4 to v5: - "at least one member" changed to "at least one other member" (Jonas, Pekka) - Replace remaining occurences of "push" with "merge" (Jonas, Pekka) - Add a clause defining "open-source" as distributed with an OSI-approved license (Drew) Diff: ht

Re: wayland-protocols scope and governance

2019-10-10 Thread Drew DeVault
I propose adding a clause which explicitly states that "open source" is defined as "distributed under an OSI-approved license". With that change: Acked-by: Drew DeVault ___ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.fr

Re: wayland-protocols scope and governance

2019-10-10 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 00:21:43 + Simon Ser wrote: > This is v4 of the proposal. > > Changes from v3 to v4: relax implementation requirements for inclusion > in "xdg" and "wp" (Jonas, Drew). > > Diff: https://sr.ht/yw0R.txt > > * * * > > wayland-protocols governance

Re: wayland-protocols scope and governance

2019-10-10 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 01:21, Simon Ser wrote: > This is v4 of the proposal. > > Changes from v3 to v4: relax implementation requirements for inclusion > in "xdg" and "wp" (Jonas, Drew). > > Diff: https://sr.ht/yw0R.txt Acked-by: Daniel Stone ___ wayla

Re: When `wl_resource_destructor` gets called after `wl_proxy_destroy` called on the client sides.

2019-10-10 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:52:33 -0400 Sichem Zhou wrote: > Hi wayland devs, > > I have a question regarding the life span of wayland objects. I know > wayland is a asynchronous API, but is there a way to know when the > wl_resource gets destroyed once `wl_proxy_destroy` in the clients? Hi, if the