On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:35:20 +1100
Graeme Gill wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > It sounds like KMS leases could be a pretty good fit for a calibration
> > application. It can lease each output individually from the Wayland
> > compositor and fully control it using KMS APIs, while the Wayland
>
On 2019-03-08 9:41 a.m., Graeme Gill wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>> It was never reliable for that. Other clients using any of those
>> mechanisms could always interfere, at least for the RandR compatibility
>> output.
>
> I disagree. It was reliable in the sense that running the
> profile lo
On 2019-03-07 10:07 p.m., Graeme Gill wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>> Yep. The alternative is that the different mechanisms clobber the
>> hardware LUT from each other, which sucks from a user POV.
>
> Which user though ?
>
> It certainly does the opposite of suck if you are a user
> who want
