On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:50 PM Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'd like to open up a discussion on enlarging wayland-protocols to a
> wider audience, with a better definition of what it contains.
Hi Daniel,
thanks for moving forward this discussion. To me your suggestions
overall sound very s
This is the alpha release for weston 6.0. A lot has happened for this
release, some big items to note are:
We now have xdg-shell stable support!
We've moved to meson as our primary build system and have deprecated the
autotools build entirely. You need to run configure with
--enable-autotools to
This is the alpha release for wayland 1.17.
In addition to some clean-ups and bug fixes, we now have protocol to
express an internal server error message, and a new version of the wl_seat
protocol with no changes other than keymaps must be private.
Full commit history follows:
Christopher James
This is a great plan, Daniel, thank you for taking the time to write it
up and help push this problem towards a solution.
On 2019-02-19 4:50 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> My first, hopefully uncontroversial, suggestion: introduce a list of
> compositors / compositor frameworks, as well as clients / c
On Tuesday, February 19, 2019 5:50 PM, Daniel Stone
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'd like to open up a discussion on enlarging wayland-protocols to a
> wider audience, with a better definition of what it contains.
First of all, thanks a lot for bringing this up and taking the time to write a
proposal!
>
Hi all,
I'd like to open up a discussion on enlarging wayland-protocols to a
wider audience, with a better definition of what it contains.
Currently, wayland-protocols is a relatively small set of protocols
which were either grandfathered in from Weston, or a semi-opinionated
set of protocols that
Hello,
Thanks everyone for the flurry of activity reviewing and landing important
patches for the release!
In agreement with Daniel's suggestion to freeze and release today, I'm
going to start rolling the alpha shortly. Here's the final release
schedule:
Alpha: today, February 19th
Beta: March
On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 10:13, Scott Anderson
wrote:
> On 18/02/19 11:02 pm, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Doing this gets _really_ tricky as you start considering things like
> > synchronised subsurfaces (which always seems to be the case), since
> > you have to make sure you're not presenting incoheren
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 16:05, Derek Foreman
wrote:
> On 1/18/19 4:20 PM, Derek Foreman wrote:
> > Does anyone have objections to an early February freeze and a March
> > release? Anyone with large series near completion?
> >
> > Also, I'd like to float the idea of removing the fbdev backend
