Rather than going the roundabout way of having systemd set the sensitivity
followed by us reading that udev property and hoping, just take the
sensitivity directly from sysfs. This makes us basically independent of what
systemd does (or the lack of systemd, where that is a problem).
It does remove
I am trying to write a simple test compositor using libweston, but it
segfaults on weston_compositor_load_backend.
Here is my code:
main.c:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main (intargc,
char **argv)
{
struct wl_display *
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:08:58PM +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov wrote:
> On 30.04.2018 08:33, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > If we get an event other than a motion event we're not wobbling so we need
> > to
> > reset and restart.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
>
> IMO this shouldn't matter, be
Hi pekka
Thank you for your clearly analysis. I understand the presentation protocol
is enough for the requirement now.
I used to not study the protocol deeply because the code is a little more
than just record the flip timestamp. The
test want to do this as simple as possible.
I will try the pr
On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:23:14 +0100
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> On 19 April 2018 at 13:09, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > this is actually clone mode series v9 part 3.
> >
> > Yes, part 2 was never posted separately, it was landed directly from v6
> > as it didn't need any changes. This here
On 30.04.2018 08:33, Peter Hutterer wrote:
If we get an event other than a motion event we're not wobbling so we need to
reset and restart.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
IMO this shouldn't matter, because if a user managed to consciously
trigger an event other than movement, it would definit
From: Semi Malinen
When displays are hot (un)plugged, it may happen that
a shell surface is left with a stale pointer to an output
that has already been freed. Add an output destroy listener
to catch such situations and set the output pointer to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Semi Malinen
Signed-off-by:
On Wed, 2 May 2018 16:33:43 +0800
zou lan wrote:
> Add to wayland mail list.
>
> Hi pekka
>
> I used to consider the time line and presentation protocol. But they are
> all focus on surface, not buffer. The test want to know the buffer latency,
> although they are the same as surface's on
> mos
Add to wayland mail list.
Hi pekka
I used to consider the time line and presentation protocol. But they are
all focus on surface, not buffer. The test want to know the buffer latency,
although they are the same as surface's on
most cases. Applications think maybe some buffers doesn't display and
From: Pekka Paalanen
This is a tentative crash fix for a case where there are no
enabled weston_outputs at all.
Let get_output_work_area() return a zero area if the given output is
NULL. If there is no output, there is no area. Unfortunately we cannot
return "no position" but have to use 0,0 ins
This is a series of fixes, for the case when Weston is running without any
connected outputs (weston_outputs).
Pekka Paalanen (4):
desktop-shell: handle NULL output in get_output_work_area()
desktop-shell: handle NULL output in center_on_output()
desktop-shell: do not lower_fullscreen_layer(
From: Pekka Paalanen
In activate, do not call lower_fullscreen_layer() at all if the output
is NULL. It should not do anything in that case, per the existing
comment.
This is a tentative crash fix for a case where there are no enabled
weston_outputs at all.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
Signed
From: Pekka Paalanen
Running 'weston-simple-egl -f -b' (fullscreen, unthrottled) caused a
crash in shell_ensure_fullscreen_black_view() due to
shsurf->fullscreen_output being NULL. Also shell_configure_fullscreen()
could crash on that condition.
Fix shell_configure_fullscreen() to bail out with
From: Pekka Paalanen
This is a tentative crash fix for a case where there are no enabled
weston_outputs at all.
If no output is given, just put the surface at 0,0. At least it should
become mostly visible if an output is plugged in, if not centered.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
Signed-off-by:
On Tue, 1 May 2018 10:18:08 +
Auke Booij wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:08 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > I think that's an oversight. It should indeed be possible to reference
> > enums just like interfaces from other protocol files.
>
> From my point of view, we did not add this whe
15 matches
Mail list logo