On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:34:01AM +0100, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> >Hi Vicente
> >
> >sorry about the delay, too many things on right now.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to review the patch.
>
> >...
> >Note: the current algorithm does ignore spurious actions, at least after the
Hi Peter,
>Hi Vicente
>
>sorry about the delay, too many things on right now.
Thank you for taking the time to review the patch.
>...
>Note: the current algorithm does ignore spurious actions, at least after the
>very first one. AIUI it's not that uncommon either when the contacts are
>wobbly. S
Bouncing can occur when a button toggles, both press and release, and can
bounce multiple times for each toggling.
The algorithm has two states: cancel_noise==false and cancel_noise==true.
When not canceling noise, the default state, any event received is
inmediately committed and state is changed
There has been a surge of recent interest in the details of using Wayland
on nontraditional systems that don't have the normal notion of human-user
login sessions. Discussions are ongoing about the details of how to manage
the allocation of TTYs and Weston's vision of the best practices for
assigni
On 11/1/17 3:24 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
From: Pekka Paalanen
Explain that -u requires root and -t requires -u. Most importantly,
document in what format does -t expect the tty to be given.
It has been confusing, because Weston's --tty option takes an integer,
weston-launch takes a full devic
On 11/1/17 3:24 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
From: Pekka Paalanen
Fix an issue introduced in:
commit ab4999492ce630e6bb1c93215fc052c2c29913bd
Author: Kristian Høgsberg
Date: Fri Jul 19 21:26:24 2013 -0700
weston-launch: Drop sleep_fork option
where the option string accidentally
On 11/1/17 3:24 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
From: Pekka Paalanen
setup_tty() function uses the tty argument for choosing the tty/VT only
if wl->new_user (the -u option) is given. If the tty option is given
without -u, it will only be used for misleading error messages.
To make it clear to the us
On 11/1/17 3:23 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
From: Pekka Paalanen
When you need to start Weston via weston-launch, systemd unit, or any
other runner, it is annoying to try to get in with a debugger,
especially if the thing you are interested in happens at start-up. To
make it easy, a new option is
From: Pekka Paalanen
Explain that -u requires root and -t requires -u. Most importantly,
document in what format does -t expect the tty to be given.
It has been confusing, because Weston's --tty option takes an integer,
weston-launch takes a full device path.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
---
From: Pekka Paalanen
Fix an issue introduced in:
commit ab4999492ce630e6bb1c93215fc052c2c29913bd
Author: Kristian Høgsberg
Date: Fri Jul 19 21:26:24 2013 -0700
weston-launch: Drop sleep_fork option
where the option string accidentally became "t::". That causes
$ weston-lauc
From: Pekka Paalanen
setup_tty() function uses the tty argument for choosing the tty/VT only
if wl->new_user (the -u option) is given. If the tty option is given
without -u, it will only be used for misleading error messages.
To make it clear to the user that -t without -u does not work the way
From: Pekka Paalanen
When you need to start Weston via weston-launch, systemd unit, or any
other runner, it is annoying to try to get in with a debugger,
especially if the thing you are interested in happens at start-up. To
make it easy, a new option is introduced.
The new option, implemented bo
Hi Emre.
On 1 November 2017 at 11:56, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)
wrote:
> Is this the latest WIP branch to test "
> https://gitlab.collabora.com/daniels/weston/commits/wip/2017-10/atomic-v13"; ?
Right you are.
> In my opinion, it would easier to review/test your patches if you can
> separate them
Hi Daniel,
Is this the latest WIP branch to test "
https://gitlab.collabora.com/daniels/weston/commits/wip/2017-10/atomic-v13"; ?
In my opinion, it would easier to review/test your patches if you can separate
them in multiple patch series.
For example, you can send at first up to "compositor-d
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 08:21:29 -0500
Matt Hoosier wrote:
> This discussion seems to hinge on whether logind can be made to work for
> Weston as spawned by system units (rather than user-session units). I find
> that sd_pid_get_session() has always failed for me (leading to the "logind
> not running
15 matches
Mail list logo
