[PATCH libinput 5/5] Add meson.build file

2017-04-25 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- meson.build | 596 ++ meson_options.txt | 16 ++ 2 files changed, 612 insertions(+) create mode 100644 meson.build create mode 100644 meson_options.txt diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build new file m

[PATCH libinput 1/5] Rename man pages to .1 suffix for meson's benefit

2017-04-25 Thread Peter Hutterer
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- tools/Makefile.am| 4 ++-- tools/{libinput-debug-events.man => libinput-debug-events.1} | 0 tools/{libinput-list-devices.man => libinput-list-devices.1} | 0 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) rename too

[PATCH libinput 2/5] doc: drop the explicit input from the doxygen.in

2017-04-25 Thread Peter Hutterer
We pass in the input via the commandline, so having the files here is misleading. Replace it with an @INPUT@ - in autotools that one is ignored but it'll help meson. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- doc/libinput.doxygen.in | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/do

[PATCH libinput 3/5] test: allow running the symbols-leak-test.in script directly

2017-04-25 Thread Peter Hutterer
With autotools, we replace the @top_srcdir@ during configure and then run teh resulting scripts. With meson, it's easier to just pass top-srcdir it in as argument. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- test/symbols-leak-test.in | 11 +-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH libinput 4/5] configure.ac: drop checks for a few flags

2017-04-25 Thread Peter Hutterer
These were added in 2013 for old enterprise distributions (centos 5.5, see fdo bz 63360), it's now 4 years later and these checks seems a bit superfluous. If those bits are missing, compilation will fail anyway. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer --- configure.ac | 9 - 1 file changed, 9 del

[PATCH libinput 0/5] Enable meson as build system

2017-04-25 Thread Peter Hutterer
This adds meson as a build system, for now in parallel to autotools but if everything goes well expect autotools to be removed in a future release. So better get on the meson bandwagon. There are a couple of minor differences, the biggest is probably that the test run doesn't automatically run va

Re: [RFC v2 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-25 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:34:06AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 09:47 -0700, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > > > > > We originally discussed maybe using pipes and now more unix domain > > sockets for 'non kernel evdev fds'. As part of the discussion we > > realized ioctls w

Re: [RFC v2 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-25 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:16:24AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 10:20 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:19:45PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:47:20AM -0700, Roderick Colenbrander > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2

Return values in Wayland XML specification

2017-04-25 Thread adlo
How are return values specified in the Wayland XML specification? Regards adlo ___ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel

Re: [PATCH] doc: compact installation instructions

2017-04-25 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:29:07AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > * Drop version-specific SO version from source-install command where > this is not needed. > * Less typing for the user: use zypper short forms. > * Less typing for the user: libtool implies automake implies > autoconf, so trim t

[PATCH] doc: compact installation instructions

2017-04-25 Thread Jan Engelhardt
* Drop version-specific SO version from source-install command where this is not needed. * Less typing for the user: use zypper short forms. * Less typing for the user: libtool implies automake implies autoconf, so trim the install command. * Just specify the requirement for a root shell instea

Re: [RFC v2 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 09:47 -0700, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > > We originally discussed maybe using pipes and now more unix domain > sockets for 'non kernel evdev fds'. As part of the discussion we > realized ioctls wouldn't be available. Thinking about it some more, I > think the lack of ioc

Re: [RFC v2 wayland-protocols] inputfd - direct input access protocol

2017-04-25 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 10:20 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:19:45PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 09:47:20AM -0700, Roderick Colenbrander > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Peter Hutterer > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr