Re: [PATCH weston 1/2] libinput: Suppress unhandled-case warning

2017-03-14 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:26:50PM +, Daniel Stone wrote: > When the wheel tilt source is present, gcc complains that we don't > handle all possible enumeration values. We already ensure this cannot > happen in its only caller (handle_pointer_axis), but gcc doesn't > recognise this. Give it a d

Re: [PATCH wayland v2 2/4] wayland-util: split out private functionality to separate file

2017-03-14 Thread Yong Bakos
Hi Emil, > On Feb 21, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > > From: Emil Velikov > > With next commit we'll make wayland-util a shared library (for reasons > mentioned in the commit). As such we need to make sure that the private > symbols are somewhere that they can be used internally. Othe

Re: not completely booting to the desktop without a screen connected?

2017-03-14 Thread Simon Eigeldinger
Hi Pekka, Thanks for the info. So i might knock at gnome's door then. Greetings, Simon Am 13.03.2017 um 10:48 schrieb Pekka Paalanen: On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:48:59 +0100 Simon Eigeldinger wrote: Hi all, I sent this message to the x server mailing list as well because i figured out that the

[PATCH weston 1/2] libinput: Suppress unhandled-case warning

2017-03-14 Thread Daniel Stone
When the wheel tilt source is present, gcc complains that we don't handle all possible enumeration values. We already ensure this cannot happen in its only caller (handle_pointer_axis), but gcc doesn't recognise this. Give it a default value to quiet the warning. Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone ---

[PATCH weston 2/2] weston-launch: Add sysmacros.h include for major()

2017-03-14 Thread Daniel Stone
Same as with c4d7f66c, but I hadn't done a full-tree rebuild so didn't see this one go by. Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone --- libweston/weston-launch.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/libweston/weston-launch.c b/libweston/weston-launch.c index 140fde1d..eecb911a 100644 --- a/lib

Re: [PATCH wayland v2 1/4] wayland-util: do not export the wl_map_* API

2017-03-14 Thread Emil Velikov
On 14 March 2017 at 11:31, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:14:26 + > Emil Velikov wrote: > >> From: Emil Velikov >> >> Used only internally and explicitly marked as such with commit >> cf04b0a18f2 ("Move private definitions and prototypes to new >> zwayland-private.h") >> >> S

Re: [PATCH weston] configure: bump libweston to 3.0.0

2017-03-14 Thread Daniel Stone
On 14 March 2017 at 10:29, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > From: Pekka Paalanen > > Bump the future release to 3.0.0 due to breaking ABI in libweston. > > We have merged a few patches already that change libweston/compositor.h. > While most of the changes arguably change only things libweston users > sho

Re: [PATCH wayland v2 1/4] wayland-util: do not export the wl_map_* API

2017-03-14 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:14:26 + Emil Velikov wrote: > From: Emil Velikov > > Used only internally and explicitly marked as such with commit > cf04b0a18f2 ("Move private definitions and prototypes to new > zwayland-private.h") > > Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov > --- > src/wayland-util.c | 18

Re: [PATCH weston] configure: bump libweston to 3.0.0

2017-03-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 14/03/17 11:29, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > From: Pekka Paalanen > > Bump the future release to 3.0.0 due to breaking ABI in libweston. > > We have merged a few patches already that change libweston/compositor.h. > While most of the changes arguably change only things libweston users > should not

[PATCH weston] configure: bump libweston to 3.0.0

2017-03-14 Thread Pekka Paalanen
From: Pekka Paalanen Bump the future release to 3.0.0 due to breaking ABI in libweston. We have merged a few patches already that change libweston/compositor.h. While most of the changes arguably change only things libweston users should not be touching, some change the size of e.g. struct westo

Re: [PATCH weston v2 00/11] Grouped output repaint

2017-03-14 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:42:26 +0200 Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:33:59 + > Daniel Stone wrote: > > > Hi, > > I'm submitting v2 of this series after Pekka's review. At this point, > > we now keep all time values in absolute timespec structs, only using > > normalisation to n