On 10 March 2017 at 15:16, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hey Emil,
>
> On 9 March 2017 at 23:12, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 3 March 2017 at 23:05, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>> - x = (x - output->base.x) * output->base.current_scale;
>>> - y = (y - output->base.y) * output->base.current_scale;
>>>
Hi Dan,
On 10 March 2017 at 15:12, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hey Emil,
>
> On 9 March 2017 at 23:51, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 3 March 2017 at 23:05, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>> +static void
>>> +drm_fb_destroy_dumb(struct drm_fb *fb)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_mode_destroy_dumb destroy_arg;
>>> +
>
On 10 March 2017 at 15:28, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hey Emil,
>
> On 9 March 2017 at 22:57, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> So was feeling a bit bored and decided to remind myself about all the
>> crazy formats out there :-)
>>
>> I believe you've got a couple of mistakes, plus there's a couple of
>> questio
Hi Emilio,
On 13 March 2017 at 17:45, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 13/03/17 17:33, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> glibc 2.25 produces a warning when sysmacros.h is not directly included
>> but major() is used, as it is intended to be moved to sysmacros.h and
>> only there. Include it to keep the bu
On 13/03/17 17:33, Daniel Stone wrote:
> glibc 2.25 produces a warning when sysmacros.h is not directly included
> but major() is used, as it is intended to be moved to sysmacros.h and
> only there. Include it to keep the build happy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
Series is:
Reviewed-by: Emil
GCC 7 now warns on case statements falling through without an explicit
comment that falling through is OK. Insert some to make it happy.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
---
desktop-shell/shell.c | 2 ++
tests/subsurface-test.c | 9 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/desktop-
glibc 2.25 produces a warning when sysmacros.h is not directly included
but major() is used, as it is intended to be moved to sysmacros.h and
only there. Include it to keep the build happy.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
---
libweston/launcher-direct.c| 1 +
libweston/launcher-logind.c
From: Pekka Paalanen
The paragraph about pageflip-timeout was added in between the two
paragraphs of idle-time, causing the paragraphs to be associated wrong.
Move the pageflip-timeout paragraph to the end.
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100163
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:52:58 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> On 10 March 2017 at 13:41, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:34:09 + Daniel Stone
> > wrote:
> >>* the deadline given by repaint_msec? In that case we delay until
> >>* the deadline o
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:33:59 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm submitting v2 of this series after Pekka's review. At this point,
> we now keep all time values in absolute timespec structs, only using
> normalisation to nsec for relative comparisons. This required the
> addition of subtraction
On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:37:14 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8 March 2017 at 14:05, Pekka Paalanen
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 11:34:08 + Daniel Stone
> > wrote:
> >> + /* XXX: This can keep postponing forever, maybe? */
> >> + if (msec_to_next < 1)
> >> +
On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:48:59 +0100
Simon Eigeldinger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I sent this message to the x server mailing list as well because i
> figured out that the server doesn't start the desktop because of no
> screen being connected.
> so i am asking this on the wayland list as well.
>
> -
12 matches
Mail list logo
