On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:52:40 +0100
Quentin Glidic wrote:
> On 21/12/2016 15:40, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > From: Pekka Paalanen
> >
> > Move the calls to set_title() and set_pid() out of
> > weston_wm_window_read_properties() and into the three callers, each
> > slightly different.
> >
> > xser
On Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:44:05 +0100
Quentin Glidic wrote:
> On 21/12/2016 15:40, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > From: Pekka Paalanen
> >
> > The legacy fullscreen state needs to be detected at MapRequest time,
> > because that is when the X11 client has alredy set up the initial window
> > state.
> >
On 16/01/2017 14:04, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 16 January 2017 at 13:01, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 15 January 2017 at 12:26, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
- PKG_CHECK_MODULES(PANGO, [pangocairo], [have_pango=yes], [have_pango=no])
+ PKG_CHECK_MODULES(PANGO, [pangocairo pango glib >= 2.36], [have_pan
Hi,
On 16 January 2017 at 15:12, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> Hey, didn’t it work already? A tiny warning is no big. ;-)
Nope, it warned and then left the panel on the left.
> Anyway:
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Glidic
Thanks! Pushed both, and your manpage fix:
To ssh://git.freedesktop.org/git/wayland/
On 16/01/2017 14:24, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi Quentin,
On 4 January 2017 at 18:15, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
It was renamed from panel-location in
55d5701ddf018887a30d9ddede38550967da61bc, and gained a few possible
values.
Conditional on the two patches to actually support panel-position
'none' th
On 16/01/2017 14:23, Daniel Stone wrote:
The manpage claims that none is valid, so let's make it so.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
Hey, didn’t it work already? A tiny warning is no big. ;-)
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Quentin Glidic
---
clients/desktop-shell.c | 25 -
1
On 16/01/2017 14:23, Daniel Stone wrote:
The desktop-shell output destroy code assumes that we always set up a
panel listener. Initialise its list explicitly, so if we don't have a
panel, then we can still unconditionally destroy the listener on output
destroy.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
Goo
Previously in picking CRTC -> encoder -> connecting routing, we went for
the first triplet we found which claimed to work.
Preserving the existing routing means that startup will be faster: on a
multi-head system, changing the routing implies disabling both CRTCs,
then re-enabling them with a new
Hi,
On 17 December 2016 at 12:40, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> Currently, layers’ order depends on the module loading order and it does
> not survive runtime modifications (like shell locking/unlocking).
> With this patch, modules can safely add their own layer at the expected
> position in the stack,
Hi Quentin,
On 4 January 2017 at 18:15, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> It was renamed from panel-location in
> 55d5701ddf018887a30d9ddede38550967da61bc, and gained a few possible
> values.
Conditional on the two patches to actually support panel-position
'none' that I just posted being merged, this is:
The desktop-shell output destroy code assumes that we always set up a
panel listener. Initialise its list explicitly, so if we don't have a
panel, then we can still unconditionally destroy the listener on output
destroy.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
---
desktop-shell/shell.c | 1 +
1 file changed
The manpage claims that none is valid, so let's make it so.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
---
clients/desktop-shell.c | 25 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clients/desktop-shell.c b/clients/desktop-shell.c
index bd0032a..b133d86 100644
---
Hi,
On 16 January 2017 at 13:01, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 15 January 2017 at 12:26, Quentin Glidic
> wrote:
>> - PKG_CHECK_MODULES(PANGO, [pangocairo], [have_pango=yes], [have_pango=no])
>> + PKG_CHECK_MODULES(PANGO, [pangocairo pango glib >= 2.36],
>> [have_pango=yes], [have_pango=no])
>
> A
On 15 January 2017 at 12:26, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> From: Quentin Glidic
>
> HAVE_PANGO is not in any AC_DEFINE(), so the check is just wrong.
> g_type_init() was never called, which is fine since GLib 2.36 anyway.
> It is better not to have a wrong usage of HAVE_PANGO here.
> Just check for GLi
Hi Quentin,
On 15 January 2017 at 13:05, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> On 29/11/2016 18:00, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> We had two non-pkg-config check paths in the configure script, to
>> support XCB functionality used before XCB had had an accompanying
>> release: xcb_poll_for_queued_event (released in 1.
Hi,
On 15 January 2017 at 18:07, Quentin Glidic
wrote:
> On 15/01/2017 18:54, Emmanuel Gil Peyrot wrote:
>> This makes the background image look much nicer, at the expense of
>> slightly more memory bandwidth used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
>
> I see no reason not to:
> Reviewed-b
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:35:13 -0800
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> Lets try that again:
>
>
> Friday the 13th of January seems an auspiciously ominous time to
> announce the schedule for 1.13. So here's the upcoming dates:
>
> - 1.13-alpha around Jan 24th. Major features done by this point.
>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
