On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Mattias Andrée wrote:
>
> > get away with 8 bit per channel CIE L*a*b* but even
> > that's questionable these days.
>
> I would reject CIE L*a*b* because it requires more
> expensive conversion and more than two conversion
> steps.
>
The conversion is lookup and
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Graeme Gill wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > 'The size and depth' and 'the CLUT' are no longer applicable. Colour
> > management units, incorporating two LUTs and a matrix (coarsely,
> > degamma-transform-regamma) are becoming rather common now. These u
On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 11:23:34 -0700
Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Mattias Andrée
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 16:25:20 +1100
> > Graeme Gill wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > > 'The size and depth' and 'the CLUT' are no longer
> > > >
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Mattias Andrée wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 16:25:20 +1100
> Graeme Gill wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > 'The size and depth' and 'the CLUT' are no longer
> > > applicable. Colour management units, incorporating two
> > > LUTs and a matrix (co
On Tuesday, 20 December 2016, 14:25:02 CET, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Niels,
> Just nitpicking at the protocol side of things a little bit; please
> excuse what I'm sure is a horrific abuse of the terminology, contained
> in what I'm sure is a series of stupid questions.
>
> On 19 November 2016 at
