On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 09:28:11AM -0500, Adam Goode wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:04:33PM -0500, Adam Goode wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349225 and
> > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/sh
Check that all the objects in an event belong to the same client as
the resource posting it. This prevents a compositor from accidentally
mixing client objects and posting an event that causes a client to
kill itself.
It's intended that the compositor killing itself be easier to debug
than the cl
On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 07:00:17 -0800
Yong Bakos wrote:
> Hi Pekka,
>
> > On Dec 1, 2016, at 3:54 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> >
> > From: Pekka Paalanen
> >
> > We should probably have a change log in the tree to list the changes
> > that end users (of weston, libweston, libweston-desktop, the a
Hey Emil,
On 1 December 2016 at 14:11, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 1 December 2016 at 11:46, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On Intel, the configure stage (autogen / meson -Dfoo) is 14-15x
>> faster. A complete build is 3x faster, and rebuilding component parts
>> of the tree is 1.5-4x faster. The 'rebuild
Hi Pekka,
> On Dec 1, 2016, at 3:54 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> From: Pekka Paalanen
>
> We should probably have a change log in the tree to list the changes
> that end users (of weston, libweston, libweston-desktop, the apps, etc.)
> might be interested in. Particularly we can list changes
Hi,
> On Dec 1, 2016, at 3:07 AM, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 30 August 2016 at 14:05, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
Xwayland should probably use a private protocol, like EGL, ideally
completely hidden and pid-restricted.
>>>
>>> That's the point,
Hi Peter,
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
> Not that it really matters, but given we're already setting it anyway...
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
This series is just a basic config and license header change, and is
Reviewed-by: Yong Bakos
yong
> ---
> src/libi
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:04:33PM -0500, Adam Goode wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349225 and
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767967
> >
> > When using Client Side Decorations, toolkits
ch autotools re-run
>> and Meson didn't; if we assume we have to take the full penalty for a
>> rebuild, then we end up on ~50s vs. ~260s.
>
> So, on this note, you guilted me into doing some more serious
> benchmarking of the results, which can be found:
> https://peopl
From: Pekka Paalanen
NEWS gets automatically into the dist tar-ball, I did not have to do anything
for that. However, I would have wanted to install both README and NEWS, but I
could not figure out the right way to do it.
If these get merged, I would expect to start requiring NEWS updates on pat
From: Pekka Paalanen
NEWS should be updated on releases.
Cc: Bryce Harrington
Signed-off-by: Pekka Paalanen
---
releasing.txt | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/releasing.txt b/releasing.txt
index 60952f9..f0ae1f2 100644
--- a/releasing.txt
+++ b/releasing.txt
@@ -12,6 +12
From: Pekka Paalanen
We should probably have a change log in the tree to list the changes
that end users (of weston, libweston, libweston-desktop, the apps, etc.)
might be interested in. Particularly we can list changes to e.g. command
line options, config file options and such which might requir
rm.c, but some
> touching wider parts of the source), this was 260.0s for make -j8, and
> 19.3sec for ninja. There were three points at which autotools re-run
> and Meson didn't; if we assume we have to take the full penalty for a
> rebuild, then we end up on ~50s vs. ~260s
Hey,
- Original Message -
> On 30 August 2016 at 14:05, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
> >> Xwayland should probably use a private protocol, like EGL, ideally
> >> completely hidden and pid-restricted.
> >
> > That's the point, I initially thought of a private protocol, but then
> > realized it c
Hi,
On 01-12-16 02:37, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Not that it really matters, but given we're already setting it anyway...
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
Series looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede
Regards,
Hans
---
src/libinput-private.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+),
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:32:07PM +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> The leave events in the respective device interfaces has been further
> documented so those can convey the necessary info when input is being
> redirected out of their currently focused surface.
>
> Only wl_touch is missing somethi
16 matches
Mail list logo
