Re: [PATCH wayland v2 1/1] protocol: Add summaries to event parameters

2016-04-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:19:36AM -0500, Yong Bakos wrote: > On Apr 5, 2016, at 6:12 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 04:48:12PM -0500, Yong Bakos wrote: > >> From: Yong Bakos > >> > >> All event arg elements now have an appropriate summary attribute. > >> This was c

Re: [PATCH v2 wayland-web] Updated build instructions for wayland-protocols and libwacom

2016-04-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 05:00:34PM -0500, Yong Bakos wrote: > On Apr 5, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 07:37:33PM -0700, spit...@gmail.com wrote: > >> From: Bill Spitzak > >> > >> The Mint instructions have been tested, I had to guess at the Ubuntu12 >

Re: [PATCH v2 wayland-web] Updated build instructions for wayland-protocols and libwacom

2016-04-08 Thread Yong Bakos
On Apr 5, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 07:37:33PM -0700, spit...@gmail.com wrote: >> From: Bill Spitzak >> >> The Mint instructions have been tested, I had to guess at the Ubuntu12 >> instructions as I no longer have that machine. >> >> v2: Use MAKEFLAG

Re: [PATCH weston v3 0/8] Implement screensaver/idle inhibition

2016-04-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 10:41:45AM -0700, Bill Spitzak wrote: > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Bryce Harrington > wrote: > > > This patchset implements screensaver inhibition for Weston (see separate > > wayland-protocols patch). > > > > The first three patches set up some infrastructure adjustm

[ANNOUNCE] libxkbcommon 0.6.1

2016-04-08 Thread Daniel Stone
Here are the NEWS for this release, our least exciting yet: libxkbcommon 0.6.1 == - Add LICENSE to distributed files in tarball releases. - Minor typo fix in xkb_keymap_get_as_string() documentation. Tarballs: git tag: xkbcommon-0.6.1 http://xkbcommon.org/download/li

Re: [PATCH wayland v2 1/1] protocol: Add summaries to event parameters

2016-04-08 Thread Yong Bakos
On Apr 5, 2016, at 6:12 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 04:48:12PM -0500, Yong Bakos wrote: >> From: Yong Bakos >> >> All event arg elements now have an appropriate summary attribute. >> This was conducted mostly in response to the undocumented parameter >> warnings gene

[PATCH libinput 2/3] libinput: Actually return the default accel profile

2016-04-08 Thread Jonas Ådahl
We just returned the current profile instead of the default one. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl --- src/libinput.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/libinput.c b/src/libinput.c index 1480878..b6e660a 100644 --- a/src/libinput.c +++ b/src/libinput.c @@

[PATCH libinput 3/3] test-pointer: Test that the default accel profile doesn't change

2016-04-08 Thread Jonas Ådahl
Make sure that changing the accel profile doesn't affect the default accel profile. Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl --- test/pointer.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/test/pointer.c b/test/pointer.c index 32e3fd2..a34740a 100644 --- a/test/pointer.c +++ b/test/pointer.c @@ -107

[PATCH libinput 1/3] test: Handle 32 bit msec time overflows

2016-04-08 Thread Jonas Ådahl
The libinput_*_get_time() returns a 32 bit unsigned integer, but in the tests we compared them to a 64 bit unsigned integer. This means that when the 32 bit integer overflowed, we'd still compare to a non-overflowed 64 bit integer, causing the tests to fail. This commit fixes this by always castin

Re: [PATCH v4 xdg-shell-unstable-v6] xdg-shell: add preferred min/max size requests

2016-04-08 Thread Olivier Fourdan
Hi Jonas, > What is the point of making the max/min size just "preferred"? What are > the use cases when compositor should ignore the hint? > > I suppose one would be when a client sets a relatively small max size, > but then asks to be maximized or fullscreened, forcing the compositor to > ignor

Re: [PATCH v4 xdg-shell-unstable-v6] xdg-shell: add preferred min/max size requests

2016-04-08 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:42:53AM -0400, Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi > > > I see no reason for "preferred" to be in the name. There is no intention to > > be able to ever specify a "real" min/max size so this word does not > > distinguish the values from any thing else. > > This was asked explic