On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 04:14:25PM +0900, �ڼ��� wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Let me share a patch for extending wayland protocol for helping a wayland
> client to identify which events are coming from which physical
> keyboard/pointer device.
>
> I��d like to discuss with you guys about this patch. : )
Sorry about the delay, I was on vacation.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:32:43PM +0900, 박성진 wrote:
> Dear Peter, thanks.
> That's right. If we modify the enum with the new one, ABI break will be made.
> Then how about add new capabilities ?
we can add new capabilities - gestures was added fairly rece
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:18:47 +0800
Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:07:19AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 15:24:04 +0100
> > Daniel Stone wrote:
> >
> > > On 9 October 2015 at 14:36, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 02:11:28PM +0100, Danie
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:41:22 +0200
Erik De Rijcke wrote:
> Adding enum members is backward compatible for Java. If you compile against
> an enum with 2 members, and later on a new member is added, you can simply
> use the new version of the enum.
>
> Important however is that the order of old me
Adding enum members is backward compatible for Java. If you compile against
an enum with 2 members, and later on a new member is added, you can simply
use the new version of the enum.
Important however is that the order of old members do not change when new
members are added.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:07:19AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 15:24:04 +0100
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > On 9 October 2015 at 14:36, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 02:11:28PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > >> >> > I still have the '_' prefix which, men
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:59:49 +0200
Ole Kliemann wrote:
> Sometime ago a question was posted on this list whether X clients
> under XWayland are separated from each other like Wayland clients
> are. It was concluded that they are not. [1]
>
> However, it was suggested that of course one could s
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 15:24:04 +0100
Daniel Stone wrote:
> On 9 October 2015 at 14:36, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 02:11:28PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> >> > I still have the '_' prefix which, mentioned by Pekka, violates some
> >> >> > rule in C. I'm not sure we need to ca
