If by "on the top of the display" you mean in terms of stacking order (e.g.
"always on top"), then it's not possible. What happens if two windows set
themselves this way?
If by "on the top of the display" you mean in terms of position, then it's
also not possible. You cannot set the position of yo
Hi ALL:
I want to make an app on the top or the display, but can't find such function
in xdg_surface API, Does somebody know how to do it?
Thanks
Best regards
Yong Gan
___
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists
I really can't imagine this is a problem, and clients may even expect
the current behavior. It certainly is expected for shift keys: if I
alt+tab to a program it acts like alt is still held down. A quick test
on Ubuntu shows that a program you alt+tab to gets a map with both alt
and tab held do
On 10/07/2014 01:46 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
More over, in the future we may get disabled_on_lid_close and
disabled_on_tablet_mode,
etc. The idea being that these are flags which can be or-ed together (using them
together with the unconditional disabled / enabled flags will lead to an EINVAL
er
weston key bindings are supposed to eat the key events, and not pass it
on to clients, and indeed the wl_keyboard.key event is not sent. But
we must also not put the key in the keys array to pass to client with
the wl_keyboard.enter event, or else we may send the 'eaten' one too.
In the case of a k
Hi,
At FOSDEM on the 31st of january and the 1st of February 2015, there
will be another graphics DevRoom. URL: https://fosdem.org/2015/
The focus of this DevRoom is of course the same as last year, namely:
* Graphics drivers: from display to media to 3d drivers, both in kernel
or userspace.
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 22:55:36 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 04:58:38PM +0200, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:45:26AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > at least with Wayland and Weston, we have bit of hard time tracking the
> > > patches t
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:09:05 +0300
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Le 2014-10-06 12:52, Pekka Paalanen a écrit :
> > Could this be solved (completely?) by saying that libraries that take
> > existing wl_proxy objects such that they
> > a) set up listeners, or
> > b) create new wl_proxies from it and
Hi,
On 10/06/2014 09:44 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> On 10/06/2014 05:59 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
>
>>> FORCE_ENABLED - Bypass anything that makes the device stop reporting events.
>>
>> why would you want that setting? if it's disabled when it shouldn't be then
>> this is a bug we need to fix.
>
