On 10/06/2014 05:59 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
FORCE_ENABLED - Bypass anything that makes the device stop reporting events.
why would you want that setting? if it's disabled when it shouldn't be then
this is a bug we need to fix.
It is what you are calling "enabled".
My complaint is that the
On Oct 6, 2014 12:45 AM, "Pekka Paalanen" wrote:
>
> Re-adding CCs and some more...
>
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:17:41 +0300
> Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Le 2014-10-06 03:29, Jason Ekstrand a écrit :
> > > Remi,
> > > While this would probably be nice, your approach isnt go
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:48:27 -0700
> "Jasper St. Pierre" wrote:
>
> > One of my issues is what happens for objects that have multiple parents,
> > like wl_buffer or wl_callback. What do we do if another person wants to
> > introduce another
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:36:30AM -0700, Bill Spitzak wrote:
>
>
> On 09/11/2014 07:34 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> >I don't like the "Smart disable" as a name because the consumer of the
> >API might only see one device for both the trackpoint and the touchpad
> >in which case you want to dis
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 03:01:35PM -0500, Derek Foreman wrote:
> We use stdbool elsewhere, so use it here too for consistency.
> ---
> src/evdev.c | 10 +-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/evdev.c b/src/evdev.c
> index d8e3e5a..1b4ce10 100644
> --- a/
Le 2014-10-06 12:52, Pekka Paalanen a écrit :
Could this be solved (completely?) by saying that libraries that take
existing wl_proxy objects such that they
a) set up listeners, or
b) create new wl_proxies from it and set their listeners;
need to also offer API to tell which versions of the passe
Le 2014-10-06 11:26, Pekka Paalanen a écrit :
> 4 or higher as a wl_surface version 3? If not, I cannot rely on
> 'wl_proxy_get_version(surface) >= 2'...
Changing the semantics[5] of wl_surface.damage is a good example
where
this would fail indeed. If a library only knows up to version 3, but
On Mon, 6 Oct 2014 10:45:14 +0300
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Re-adding CCs and some more...
>
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:17:41 +0300
> Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Le 2014-10-06 03:29, Jason Ekstrand a écrit :
> > > Remi,
> > > While this would probably be nice, your approac
Re-adding CCs and some more...
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:17:41 +0300
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 2014-10-06 03:29, Jason Ekstrand a écrit :
> > Remi,
> > While this would probably be nice, your approach isnt going to work.
>
> Yeah, I figured that much after I submitted the pa
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:48:27 -0700
"Jasper St. Pierre" wrote:
> One of my issues is what happens for objects that have multiple parents,
> like wl_buffer or wl_callback. What do we do if another person wants to
> introduce another (like the recently proposed pointer lock extension)? We
> can recom
10 matches
Mail list logo
