Re: [Question] Z-order management in Wayland

2014-08-01 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
Please stop bringing this up in unrelated threads. This is a warning. Do not do it again. On Aug 1, 2014 4:10 PM, "Bill Spitzak" wrote: > On 07/31/2014 07:27 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > The most obvious thing that does not work is drag & drop. >>> >> >> what has that got to d

Re: [Question] Z-order management in Wayland

2014-08-01 Thread Bill Spitzak
On 07/31/2014 07:27 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: The most obvious thing that does not work is drag & drop. what has that got to do with a click raising or not? dnd is a separate protocol element with its own semantics. You want to be able to drag out of a window without raisin

Re: RFC : xdg_surface_present() look-and-feel and implementation

2014-08-01 Thread Manuel Bachmann
Hello everybody, I just updated the repo today ( https://github.com/Tarnyko/weston-xdg_surface_present/commit/0aca29d4b6dbe10d5237aaf5f35f72d25db3ac30). The "xdg_surface_present()" request not accepts a timestamp (uint32_t type) as an additional parameter. If different of 0, and it is the first t

Re: [Question] Z-order management in Wayland

2014-08-01 Thread Manuel Bachmann
Yan, "gl" comes from the mesa package, but has been disabled in the pure wayland profile ("libGL.so" pulls "libX11.so"). My guess is that your gbs' build.conf is not correct or up-to-date, as "gl" only appears if the "%with x" macro is defined, while it is not in recent config files. So you likel

Re: [Question] Z-order management in Wayland

2014-08-01 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:21:15 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 01:02:33 -0700 (PDT) yan.w...@linux.intel.com said: > > > E.g. When we start a new application on mobile platform, previous running > > application could be hidden and paused to reduce power consumin

Re: [Question] Z-order management in Wayland

2014-08-01 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 01:20:32 -0700 (PDT) yan.w...@linux.intel.com wrote: > Yes. I also think so. But we may need the comments of Wayland maintainer > about this design because it need change the compositor logic. Already if a surface is not part of any output's repaint (i.e. is not on any layer t