On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:20:41PM -0400, Stephen Chandler Paul wrote:
> Because the values for each axis were stored in struct tablet_dispatch in
> millimeters, coordinates were not being translated properly to screen
> coordinates. This stores the values internally as raw coordinates, and only
>
Set BTN_TOUCH, BTN_TOOL_DOUBLETAP automatically depending on the number of
fingers down.
This emulates real event sequences a bit better than the current approach,
though it's not a 100% correct emulation:
1) On real devices, BTN_* are usually sent last before the SYN_REPORT - here
they are sen
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 03:25:47PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On semi-mt touchpads the reported position of the first finger down may
> jump when the pad switches from st to mt mode. When this happens a large
> delta gets seen on the first finger at the same time the second fingers
> is first se
I think the way it's handled in subsurfaces allows you to create a
subsurface from a surface, delete the surface, and then re-use the surface
as something else. If I recall correctly, weston allows a fair amount of
surface re-use right now.
That said, I'm not opposed to not allowing it for xdg su
The shell command for dist_man3_MANS gets invoked several times during
the make process but before the man pages have been generated, which
causes the following warnings when running `make`:
find: `man/man3': No such file or directory
find: `man/man3': No such file or directory
find: `
Note that I fixed GTK+ to always create a new wl_surface and never reuse
it. I don't think it makes any sense to keep the wl_surface around in the
background. I certainly don't think it ever makes sense to destroy the
xdg_surface and then make it into an xdg_popup or similar.
The semantics of "onc
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 10:03 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Sjoerd Simons <
> sjoerd.sim...@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > Remove the explicit destroy method from xdg_surface and xdg_popup as
> > neither of them can be re-created after being destroyed. As a results a
Signed-off-by: Bryce Harrington
---
.gitignore |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index c146bac..d9d26ed 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ fixed-benchmark
fixed-test
list-test
map-test
+message-test
os-wrappers-test
queue-
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 07:55:10PM +0530, Sujith H wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using a freescale embedded device ( imx6 series) to run weston. I am
> able to successfully run on desktop-shell as well as the ivi-shell. The
> touch is also working fine. My query here is that the touch is not getting
>
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 12:46 AM, Manuel Bachmann <
manuel.bachm...@open.eurogiciel.org> wrote:
> Hi Jasper, Jaspon, thanks for taking good arguments to the table,
>
> "Destroying and creating an xdg_surface will, certainly."
>
> Yes, that's what we have been doing for some time, but it has the se
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Sjoerd Simons <
sjoerd.sim...@collabora.co.uk> wrote:
> Remove the explicit destroy method from xdg_surface and xdg_popup as
> neither of them can be re-created after being destroyed. As a results a
> wl_surface gets into an odd sort of odd limbo state after a
> xd
Hi all,
I am using a freescale embedded device ( imx6 series) to run weston. I am
able to successfully run on desktop-shell as well as the ivi-shell. The
touch is also working fine. My query here is that the touch is not getting
calibrated precisely. When I launch an example from Qt5, say animated
On semi-mt touchpads the reported position of the first finger down may
jump when the pad switches from st to mt mode. When this happens a large
delta gets seen on the first finger at the same time the second fingers
is first seen down, causing a spurious 2 finger scroll event.
Reset the motion hi
Remove the explicit destroy method from xdg_surface and xdg_popup as
neither of them can be re-created after being destroyed. As a results a
wl_surface gets into an odd sort of odd limbo state after a
xdg_{surface,popup}.destroy call where it not only no longer has an
xdg_{surface,popup} associated
Hi,
On 07/21/2014 08:40 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> More expressive in the caller and less ambiguous about return values (is it 1?
> is it non-zero? can it be negative?)
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
Looks good, series is:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> src/evdev-mt-t
Hi,
On 07/21/2014 08:36 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer
> ---
> Series looks good, just double-check the tests for me please. This needs the
> fixed bcm5974 patch I just sent a minute ago to work.
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede
Regards,
Hans
>
> test/touc
Hi,
On 07/21/2014 08:31 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> They don't set resolution so we can't calculate the size but we know they're
> big enough to need palm detection.
>
> And fix the descriptor for the bcm5974. For some reason this was advertising
> synaptics coordinates. Fix it to represent (one
Hey Jasper,
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 17:57 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> We've gone through enough churn of xdg-shell that we're now feeling
> confident enough to commit to this much. Let's do it.
It would make me much more confident if the somewhat odd life-time rules
of xdg-shell were addresse
18 matches
Mail list logo
