Re: ANNOUNCE: New Wayland live CD

2014-03-21 Thread nerdopolis
On Friday, March 21, 2014 08:35:40 PM nerdopolis wrote: > Hi. > > > I am announcing new ISOs for my Wayland Live CD, which is named after my > favorite celebrity. > > > You can find the new ISOs here: > https://sourceforge.net/projects/rebeccablackos/files/2014-03-21/ > > Once again, the larg

ANNOUNCE: New Wayland live CD

2014-03-21 Thread nerdopolis
Hi. I am announcing new ISOs for my Wayland Live CD, which is named after my favorite celebrity. You can find the new ISOs here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/rebeccablackos/files/2014-03-21/ Once again, the larger ISO is only larger because it has more development headers, binaries with

Re: [PATCH libinput 2/3] udev: factor out device_removed handling

2014-03-21 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:13:21PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > No functional changes > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer > --- > I needed this for the rescan patch but it makes the calls more symmetrical, > so we might as well push it independently. Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl on all 3 patches, w

Re: [PATCH libinput 3/3] Expand documentation for libinput_udev_create_for_seat

2014-03-21 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 02:13:22PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer > --- > src/libinput.h | 6 ++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/libinput.h b/src/libinput.h > index d6bf9f8..3e09871 100644 > --- a/src/libinput.h > +++ b/src/libinput.h > @@

Re: [RFC PATCH libinput] udev: add libinput_udev_rescan_devices()

2014-03-21 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:27:45AM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: >> So you're saying that every time we're suspended, we simply throw out the >> entire context and drop all the devices on the floor, as if you just >> unplugged all of t

Re: [RFC PATCH libinput] udev: add libinput_udev_rescan_devices()

2014-03-21 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:27:45AM -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote: > So you're saying that every time we're suspended, we simply throw out the > entire context and drop all the devices on the floor, as if you just > unplugged all of them? No, what I meant was possible was: 1. start 2. "resume" de