Hi,
On 30 July 2013 00:15, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 05:16:45AM +0100, Louis-Francis Ratté-Boulianne wrote:
>> Fix a segfault occuring after the last X window was closed.
>
> Thanks, that looks good.
Did this get lost?
Cheers,
Daniel
>> src/xwayland/window-manager.c |
config.h includes were missing in a few files, including input.c, the
lack of which caused the X11 backend to segfault instantly due to not
having an xkbcommon context.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone
---
This is actually against 1.2 branch, but should apply fine to master.
Please apply to unbreak
>From 3c68e0e2aa98250c65a5d5e9658299904ccf34f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rusty Lynch
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:27:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add touch support for wl_shell_surface_move
---
clients/calibrator.c| 4 +-
clients/desktop-shell.c | 9 ++--
clients/flower.c| 11 +++
>From 31c091b0de2d97b722b21a6bd0ad8c309fb3598a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rusty Lynch
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:41:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] protocol: make wl_shell_surface_move support touch
Bump the version of the wl_shell_surface interface and specify that
wl_shell_surface_move works with
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 22:24 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 14 August 2013 22:13, Rusty Lynch wrote:
> > I couldn't find a way to determine if the move request was triggered for
> > touch or mouse events.
>
> Serial numbers are unique per-display. So there's no possibility for
> collisi
Hi,
On 14 August 2013 22:13, Rusty Lynch wrote:
> I couldn't find a way to determine if the move request was triggered for
> touch or mouse events.
Serial numbers are unique per-display. So there's no possibility for
collision: a serial will either be for a button press, a key press, a
touch do
I couldn't find a way to determine if the move request was triggered for
touch or mouse events.
--rusty
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 16:09 -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> Rusty,
> Is there a particular reason for adding another request that's
> basically identical to "move"? Couldn't we just bump the
Rusty,
Is there a particular reason for adding another request that's basically
identical to "move"? Couldn't we just bump the protocol version and allow
the clients to respond to touch events with a move request? The compositor
could sort out what kind of event it is based on the serial.
--Jason
If compare with previous patch, this has a small documentation improvement.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Maksim Melnikau wrote:
> diff --git a/man/weston.ini.man b/man/weston.ini.man
> index 9c22b3f..79743f0 100644
> --- a/man/weston.ini.man
> +++ b/man/weston.ini.man
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ The
It sets the path to the xserver to run.
Signed-off-by: Maksim Melnikau
---
man/weston.ini.man | 7 +++
src/xwayland/launcher.c | 10 --
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/weston.ini.man b/man/weston.ini.man
index 9c22b3f..79743f0 100644
--- a/ma
>From ad35f8b820c06f0ce93926ef43334f93d54e6f86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rusty Lynch
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:27:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for wl_shell_surface_touch_move
---
clients/calibrator.c| 4 +-
clients/desktop-shell.c | 9 ++--
clients/flower.c| 11 +++
>From d1d0df0688650ea23a1c5c788f7d7bbf3e7e034c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rusty Lynch
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 08:06:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Add protocol support for wl_shell_surface_touch_move
---
protocol/wayland.xml | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/protoco
On Aug 14, 2013 5:14 AM, "Daniel Stone" wrote:
>
> On 14 August 2013 10:03, Rob Bradford wrote:
> > On 13 August 2013 20:11, Rob Bradford wrote:
> >> +static void
> >> +pointer_release(struct wl_client *client, struct wl_resource
*resource)
> >> +{
> >> + wl_resource_destroy(resource);
> >
Yeah. I'll do a destroy fade out animation in orbital now that this is in.
Giulio
2013/8/14 Kristian Høgsberg
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:10:14PM +0200, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> > this allows a surface to live on after its resource has been
> > destroyed if the ref-count was increased by some
On 14 August 2013 10:03, Rob Bradford wrote:
> On 13 August 2013 20:11, Rob Bradford wrote:
>> +static void
>> +pointer_release(struct wl_client *client, struct wl_resource *resource)
>> +{
>> + wl_resource_destroy(resource);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Wondering if we should also send leave events here
On 14 August 2013 04:48, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:13:53AM +0200, Armin K wrote:
>> ---
>> configure.ac | 43 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> That looks very nice, thanks.
Cool patch - going to save me
On 13 August 2013 20:11, Rob Bradford wrote:
> +static void
> +pointer_release(struct wl_client *client, struct wl_resource *resource)
> +{
> + wl_resource_destroy(resource);
> +}
> +
Wondering if we should also send leave events here if the pointer has
a focus...The only other time we des
It sets the path to the xserver to run.
Signed-off-by: Maksim Melnikau
---
man/weston.ini.man | 6 ++
src/xwayland/launcher.c | 10 --
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/weston.ini.man b/man/weston.ini.man
index 9c22b3f..204c4ee 100644
--- a/man
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:53:08AM +0300, Maksim Melnikau wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Maksim Melnikau
> ---
> man/weston.man | 3 +++
> src/weston-launch.c | 4
> src/xwayland/launcher.c | 9 +++--
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Could we make this a weston.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:13:53AM +0200, Armin K wrote:
> ---
> configure.ac | 43 ++-
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
That looks very nice, thanks.
Kristian
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index e36b7f7..fab0b48 100644
> -
20 matches
Mail list logo
