Re: [PATCH] Last updates for the RDP compositor

2013-05-21 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 21 May 2013 23:53:53 +0200 Hardening wrote: > This patch fixes the compilation of the RDP compositor with the head of the > FreeRDP project. It also brings the following improvements/fixes: > * the fake seat as been dropped as now a compositor can be safely started > without any seat > *

Re: [PATCH 2/2] protocol: Support scaled outputs and surfaces

2013-05-21 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 20 May 2013 13:56:27 -0500 Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:43:52 -0500 > > Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > > > The point of this soi is to allow surfaces to render the same size on > > > different density outputs.

Re: [RFC] libinputmapper: Input device configuration for graphic-servers

2013-05-21 Thread Rick Yorgason
On 2013-05-20 23:56, Peter Hutterer wrote: what I am wondering is whether that difference matters to the outside observer (i.e. the compositor). a gamepad and a joystick are both gaming devices and with the exception of the odd need to control the pointer it doesn't matter much which type they ar

Re: Documentation? - a non-x Linux base for wayland/weston to build on?

2013-05-21 Thread darxus
Somebody documented getting wayland to work without X on Arch here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Wayland#Pure_Wayland I'd love to see more / better documentation on the subject. On 05/22, scsijon wrote: > I thought I would build a minimum linux 3.8.x system.iso to build a > NON-X base for

Documentation? - a non-x Linux base for wayland/weston to build on?

2013-05-21 Thread scsijon
I thought I would build a minimum linux 3.8.x system.iso to build a NON-X base for wayland/weston to reside on. However I can't find any form of a minimal packagelist anywhere around on the net for what is required and what can be left out. I am considering something like Landley's Aboriginal L

[PATCH] Last updates for the RDP compositor

2013-05-21 Thread Hardening
This patch fixes the compilation of the RDP compositor with the head of the FreeRDP project. It also brings the following improvements/fixes: * the fake seat as been dropped as now a compositor can be safely started without any seat * fixed a wrong initialisation of the NSC encoder context * the fi

Re: [PATCH 2/2] protocol: Support scaled outputs and surfaces

2013-05-21 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Tue, 21 May 2013 08:35:53 -0700 Bill Spitzak wrote: > On 05/20/2013 11:46 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > >> Let's say the output is 10,000dpi and the compositor has set it's scale > >> to 100. Can a client make a buffer that is 10,050 pixels wide appear 1:1 > >> on the pixels of this output? I

Re: [PATCH 2/2] protocol: Support scaled outputs and surfaces

2013-05-21 Thread John Kåre Alsaker
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote: >However both proposals have this problem if pre-compositing is not done, and most practical shells I can figure out can't do pre-compositing because that requires another buffer for every parent, so maybe this is not a big deal. Pre-compositin

[RFC weston] compositor: Use ordered layers

2013-05-21 Thread Quentin Glidic
From: Quentin Glidic It allows a more generic layer management that several modules can use at the same time without breaking each others’ layers. Signed-off-by: Quentin Glidic --- This change is incomplete but the desktop shell works fine with it. The idea is to allow other modules to use la

Re: [PATCH 2/2] protocol: Support scaled outputs and surfaces

2013-05-21 Thread Bill Spitzak
On 05/20/2013 11:46 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: Let's say the output is 10,000dpi and the compositor has set it's scale to 100. Can a client make a buffer that is 10,050 pixels wide appear 1:1 on the pixels of this output? It looks to me like only multiples of 100 are possible. As far as I under

Re: [RFC] libinputmapper: Input device configuration for graphic-servers

2013-05-21 Thread David Herrmann
Hi Peter On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:16:11PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi Peter >> >> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Peter Hutterer >> wrote: >> > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 04:20:59PM +0200, David Herrmann wrote: >> [..] >> >> So what

Re: [PATCH weston] udev-seat: Fail seat setup only if the seat is incomplete

2013-05-21 Thread Rob Bradford
Hi Kristian, I think I should split the patch in two. Firstly not abort the compositor initialisation if we can't open a device or if there is a problem with the device and secondly some kind of input presence tests. In terms of presence tests what condition ar we trying to mitigate against? I pe

Re: [PATCH weston 4/8] shell: Use relative layers for lock/unlock

2013-05-21 Thread Quentin Glidic
This patch should be replaced with a more generic mechanism. Proposal and patches will come soon as a new series. -- Quentin “Sardem FF7” Glidic ___ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/lis

weston-launch logging and security (Re: [PATCH weston] weston-launch: Print explanation of why we failed to open the device)

2013-05-21 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:56:47 -0400 Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote: > > From: Rob Bradford > > That's better, though I wonder if we should instead let weston log the > error message using weston_log()... committed this for now. That was m