Re: [PATCH 1/2] protocol: Allow output changes to be treated atomically

2013-05-19 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:49:35 +0200 al...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Alexander Larsson > > This add a wl_output.done event which is send after every group > of events caused by some property change. This allows clients to treat > changes touching multiple events in an atomic fashion. Hi, why did

Re: [PATCH] wl_shell: Add surface state changed event

2013-05-19 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Wed, 15 May 2013 11:37:19 -0700 Mikko Levonmaa wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:12:43PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Mikko Levonmaa > > wrote: > > > > This allows the shell to inform the surface that it has changed > > state, current supported

Re: [PATCH weston 1/6] protocol: improve sub-surface spec wording

2013-05-19 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Fri, 17 May 2013 16:20:48 -0400 Kristian Høgsberg wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 04:46:03PM +0300, ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Pekka Paalanen > > > > Mention, that sub-surfaces are not clipped to the parent. > > Be more accurate on surface commit vs. apply state. > > Mention the i