Hi,
I cooked the patch to improve the opaque setting logic in ecore_wayland.
It can significantly help the weston to do more efficient compositing.
Modifications including:
1. Update win->region.opaque in ecore_wl_window_update_size, so that
the opaque info is synced with the geometry.
2. Add win-
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:36:43 -0200
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
Hi. I'm afraid that notification windows and tooltips are quite similar.
I don't think so, because...
It sounds like the important difference is that the compositor positions
these windows.
Therefore I woul
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> . . . It also means we can have clients that know they are useful when
> partially buried and not raise on some clicks, which would be an AMAZING
> improvement of usabilty we have been lacking for 25 years now ever since
> Windows broke this an
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
If the client wants to assign keyboard focus to a different
(sub-)surface than where the compositor is offering it, that is left
for a future keyboard focus negotiation protocol,
As long as the key events are delivered to *any* client surface then the
client can pretend
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:04:03 +0200
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> The shell needs to redirect some actions to the parent surface, when
> they originally target a sub-surface. This patch implements the
> following:
> - When the activation binding (left button click) targets a sub-surface,
> activate th
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:27:55 +0100
Quentin Glidic wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 14:25, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > This is a good start.
> >
> > There are some further questions, which might affect the needed
> > protocol, just food for thought for the future:
>
> I’m not a big fan of animations but I u
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:00:25 +0100
Quentin Glidic wrote:
> ---
> src/shell.c | 141
> ++--
> weston.ini | 5 +++
> 2 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Apart from some style issues, this patch looks a lot like what I
expe
On 04/01/2013 14:25, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> This is a good start.
>
> There are some further questions, which might affect the needed
> protocol, just food for thought for the future:
I’m not a big fan of animations but I understand people might want it
and it should be handled.
> - is it the
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:47:12 +0200
Mika Boström wrote:
> On 01/04/13 13:30, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > That is strange. Why does Weston need any root access for you? Are you
> > perhaps running it via remote login, not local?
>
> That could be it. I'm doing everything I can over ssh. It's worked
On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:36:43 -0200
Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> Hi. I'm afraid that notification windows and tooltips are quite similar.
>
> I've built tooltip on toytoolkit using set_transient surface type, using
> the inactive method (for not giving focus on it). So instead creating a
> new surfa
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:55:05 -0800
Bill Spitzak wrote:
> Oh sh.. it is a "layer".
>
> > + struct weston_layer notification_layer;
>
> This is not good. Please figure out a way so that clients can control
> the window stacking without having to copy every idea that a client
> needs into the
On 01/04/13 13:30, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> That is strange. Why does Weston need any root access for you? Are you
> perhaps running it via remote login, not local?
That could be it. I'm doing everything I can over ssh. It's worked
marvelously for intel+DRM case, so I naturally wanted the same ease
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:32:43 +0200
Mika Boström wrote:
> On 01/03/13 20:46, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> >> Yep. Non-root user doesn't have permission to connect to Wayland socket.
> >
> > Weston will create the socket with permissions so that only the user
> > weston runs as can access it. This
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:16:40 -0600
Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> PQ et. al.,
Hi Jason
> I've finally found the time to sit down and draft up my proposal for how
> events and requests get handled to make it easier to write language
> bindings. As a word of disclaimer, I've tried to pick through the so
On 01/03/13 20:46, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
>> Yep. Non-root user doesn't have permission to connect to Wayland socket.
>
> Weston will create the socket with permissions so that only the user
> weston runs as can access it. This is deliberate and how the
> authentication works. As such, you can
15 matches
Mail list logo
