On 04/23/2012 05:02 PM, Zhao, Halley wrote:
== version 2:
- follow Gwenole's feed back to change wayland_gbm_* to wl_gbm_*
- use Evolution to send the patch (some previous patches sent from
outlook are blocked)
- add patch 5 to change file names from *drm* to *gbm*
== original patch in
On 04/20/2012 03:27 PM, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
"Initial assumption for wl_display and related objects was that it is
not going to be thread safe, and you have to lock access to the wl API
yourself if you're going to use it from multiple threads. It's a
valid assumption and it avoids fine grai
I haven't gotten it to work, but krh says it works for him on Intel.
timon37 says it works for him with his Radeon DDX, which hasn't been
mentioned here before, and also with wlshm after replacing instances of
"hosted.h" with "xwayland.h".
This is with Wayland/Weston master, not 0.85. And krh's m
On 23 April 2012 13:44, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Btw. I can't find a definition for __NR_accept4 in Bionic. __NR_accept
> is there. Are those constants between arches, would I be able to
> #define it myself?
ARM was missed off when accept4 was added. This was rectified for 2.6.36:
http://git.kerne
On segunda-feira, 23 de abril de 2012 15.44.16, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Btw. I can't find a definition for __NR_accept4 in Bionic. __NR_accept
> is there. Are those constants between arches, would I be able to
> #define it myself?
The system call numbers are arch-dependent. They come from ,
which
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:10 +0200
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 23 de abril de 2012 11.22.16, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > > PS: if you're reading this and you want to run Wayland on your non-Linux
> > > system, you should also add those to your OS. Yesterday.
> >
> > Hi Thiago,
> >
>
On segunda-feira, 23 de abril de 2012 11.22.16, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > PS: if you're reading this and you want to run Wayland on your non-Linux
> > system, you should also add those to your OS. Yesterday.
>
> Hi Thiago,
>
> you speak with the voice of reason. Unfortunately, I doubt reason or
> s
update patch with additional change:
change gbm_bo_create_from_handle to gbm_bo_create_from_native_handle
with parameter of gbm_bo_handle
diff --git a/src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.c
b/src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.c
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 7bb32bd..9065c42
--- a/src/egl/drivers/d
patch 5/5: file name change from drm to gbm
From 55c1d4a54cfa988b9400c3bdb38d1d9cf1084950 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Halley Zhao
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:49:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] file name change from drm to gbm
---
configure.ac |4 +-
src/
patch 4/5:remove previous create/release_buffer in driver backend
>From 3cd7d26d864db4f88dfd46a7507450be48a54323 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Halley Zhao
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:35:27 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] remove previous create/release_buffer
implementation
from dri
---
src/egl/drive
patch 3/5: use wayland-gbm to create/destroy wl_buffer
>From 9a5da4167d94164d97b3a53b32ecda3e46b16323 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Halley Zhao
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 17:15:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] use wayland-gbm to create/destroy wl_buffer
---
src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.c
patch 1/5: term change from drm to gbm in driver backend
>From cdd1d1decadd65a63e7a874e2b56ef70db8cff39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Halley Zhao
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:37:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] term change from drm to gbm in driver backend
---
src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.c
From 3297c0a4590605bfa45558ad900523e8df8cc015 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Halley Zhao
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:37:21 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] term change from drm to gbm inside wayland-drm
---
.../wayland/wayland-drm/protocol/wayland-drm.xml |8 +-
src/egl/wayland/wayland-drm/wayland
== version 2:
- follow Gwenole's feed back to change wayland_gbm_* to wl_gbm_*
- use Evolution to send the patch (some previous patches sent from
outlook are blocked)
- add patch 5 to change file names from *drm* to *gbm*
== original patch information
EGL implements wayland-drm protocol, ho
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:04:32 +0200
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
>> On sexta-feira, 20 de abril de 2012 16.46.52, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>> > Hi Kristian,
>> >
>> > finally I am getting the test framework up for my OS wrappers. I added
>> > aut
No, just reality.
Kristian
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:16:27 -0400
> Kristian Hoegsberg wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:50:08PM -0400, cdah...@redhat.com wrote:
>> > From: Casey Dahlin
>> >
>> > All outputs now have a unique integer ID
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:04:32 +0200
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 20 de abril de 2012 16.46.52, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > Hi Kristian,
> >
> > finally I am getting the test framework up for my OS wrappers. I added
> > automatic fd leak checks, and helpers for checking fd leaks through
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:16:27 -0400
Kristian Hoegsberg wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:50:08PM -0400, cdah...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Casey Dahlin
> >
> > All outputs now have a unique integer ID, allocated from a bitfield pool in
> > the
> > compositor.
>
> Committed this one with a f
18 matches
Mail list logo