On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 12:26 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Does something prevent you from using the deferred task pattern
> like upstream uses? By your explanation, it sounds like it would
> achieve exactly the same (you have no other events coming when
> you wait for your callback), and avoid a v
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:43:17 +0300
Hannu Lyytinen wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 11:49 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 01:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
> > yan.w...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > wl_display_iterate will be called in multiply threads?
> > > Normally, I think it may be calle
