Re: client side decorations

2011-05-09 Thread Russell Shaw
On 10/05/11 07:29, Daniel wrote: El dg 08 de 05 de 2011 a les 09:47 -0700, en/na Bill Spitzak va escriure: Though it is possible, I don't like the idea of clients sending hints about what areas are the close box or window border, since it implies there are such concepts as "title bar" and "clos

Re: client side decorations

2011-05-09 Thread andre.knis...@gmx.de
Actually, I think Iskren made a very important point. To take this one step further: with CSD, we can't force the client to stop drawing the decoration, we can only tell the client that it should. So we can assume Chrome having a decoration for example, what shouldn't be possible in a tiling WM.

Re: client side decorations

2011-05-09 Thread Daniel
El dg 08 de 05 de 2011 a les 09:47 -0700, en/na Bill Spitzak va escriure: > > Though it is possible, I don't like the idea of clients sending hints > about what areas are the close box or window border, since it implies > there are such concepts as "title bar" and "close box". The compositor > can

Call for desktop/graphics/mobile tracks for Linux Plumbers' Conf 2011

2011-05-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
We have both desktop (for general graphics/media stuff) and mobile tracks at this year's LPC. So if you're working on a topic related to one of the above areas, especially one that has open issues or spans multiple parts of the stack, please submit a topic for discussion at http://www.linuxplumber

Re: client side decorations

2011-05-09 Thread Iskren Chernev
I can't get one thing out of this discussion. So you are arguing about client side VS server side decorations, handling of moves/resizes, maybe even buttons scroll bars etc. But all wayland does is provide a communication channel that enables "clients" to draw in the GPU memory, and then "composit